Proposed legislation would restrict Ecology in banning wells

by David Lester
Yakima Herald-Republic

 

YAKIMA, Wash. -- Kittitas County residents urged state lawmakers Wednesday to require the state Department of Ecology to have scientific proof that new wells are hurting senior water rights and stream flows before they could impose a moratorium on new uses.

Kitty Wallace, representing the
Kittitas County Association of Realtors, told lawmakers in Olympia that property owners, schools and public safety are suffering because of a moratorium on wells imposed by the state last summer.

"We are in a situation where property values aren't what people are paying taxes on. They are boycotting paying their taxes," she said at a hearing that was broadcast on the Web by TVW. "Schools will suffer. Bond and maintenance and operation levies aren't getting support."

Mark Rich, another real estate agent, said banks are refusing to lend money for new homes because of the uncertainty about wells.

"This was a shortsighted decision. As a result, the county is essentially redlined," he said. "Unemployment rates have soared and citizens face the potential loss of their homes."

Their testimony came in support of a bill introduced by State Sen. Janéa Holmquist, R-Moses Lake. Senate Bill 6536 would require Ecology officials to have "peer-reviewed scientific evidence" that new wells are taking water that belongs to holders of senior rights before they could halt new well connections.

The bill was the subject of a hearing before the Committee on Environment, Water and Energy.

Similar legislation has been introduced in the state House of Representatives.

House Bill 2666, introduced by state Reps. Bruce Chandler, R-Granger, and Judy Warnick, R-Moses Lake, also would require the Department of Ecology to have evidence before prohibiting new uses. The department also would have to make sure a new supply of water is available for water users before closing a basin to new uses.

State Rep. Bill Hinkle, R-Cle Elum, also has a bill, HB 2542, co-sponsored by Warnick, that would require a study of the conflicts between local land-use plans and the availability of water.

It is partly that conflict that led Ecology in July to halt new water wells in the upper part of the county west of Indian John Hill. State law allows homeowners to drill a well without a state permit so long as they take no more than 5,000 gallons per day.

Ecology officials imposed the moratorium because of concern that a proliferation of new wells during the past decade is damaging the rights of senior water users and hurting stream flows.

Supporters of Holmquist's bill urged lawmakers to approve the measure so other areas of the state don't face the same economic crisis.

In her introductory re-marks, Holmquist said she has heard from Skagit and Whatcom counties where fears of a similar well ban exist.

Environmental groups, however, testified against the bill, calling bans a way to protect existing rights.

Darcy Nonemacher of
Seattle, representing Amer-ican Rivers, testified that the Yakima River Basin, including the Kittitas Valley, has no additional water available to support new development.

"We fear this bill will take away the Department of Ecology's ability to stop the bleeding in basins that are over-appropriated and gather the science necessary to address these more urgent conflicts with water users who have rights."

She said the state is operating a broken system for managing water and that Ecology lacks the tools to address the concerns of water right holders.

Ecology and county officials are considering a proposal that would allow property owners a 150-day window until early September to drill wells and put the water to use. The state proposal is a way to relieve some of the economic fallout from the moratorium on wells.

Commissioner Paul Jewell accused the depart-ment of using existing state law "as a political tool to coerce local legislative authorities to bend to the will of the DOE," he said.

But Ken Slattery, head of
the Department of Ecology's water resources program, told lawmakers the agency doesn't want property owners to assume that if they drill a well, their right to water is safe. New wells, while not subject to needing a state permit, still are governed by state water law that protects older rights during times of shortage. During those periods, new rights are shut off.

Slattery said shortages have occurred in the Yakima River Basin in 30 percent of the years since 1970.

"The basis of our concern is that new homes going in have a risk of not having a water supply in three of every 10 summers," he said.



Commentsicon2
Posted by alokalyokal at 01/28/10 01:12AM        Post ID#: #25067

If we're operating a broken system, it must be a good one, or we'd have replaced it with a cheap store-bought from China in a flash. 150-day 'well-water pinata' indeed. Let's just pay for the blackrock or pray for rain. Does water go on trains? Sanctions from the government on water consumption, California here we come. --- Let's hear from the residents.

Report Violation
Posted by Just_Bob at 01/28/10 03:26PM        Post ID#: #25147

I know I was just waiting for Real-Estate / Developer spokesmen to chime in on this issue. Who better to trust on a long-term survival issue than the people that brought us the housing bubble(s).

I suspect there are hundreds if not thousands of lower valley well owners and water rights owners that wish someone had been looking out for them before it was too late.

Having spent a bit of time in the Southwest, it is not a pretty site when the water is over-subscribed and levels are dropping like a rock. Seems we had a pre-view of that here 20-30 years ago before all the deep wells. You can literally have neighbors looking down the barrels of guns at each other.

I suspect 25-30 years from now, that even the high price of Blackrock will look like a bargain to the remaining inhabitants with their desert motive yards and gardens.

Report Violation
Posted by Just_Bob at 01/28/10 03:26PM        Post ID#: #25148

I know I was just waiting for Real-Estate / Developer spokesmen to chime in on this issue. Who better to trust on a long-term survival issue than the people that brought us the housing bubble(s).

I suspect there are hundreds if not thousands of lower valley well owners and water rights owners that wish someone had been looking out for them before it was too late.

Having spent a bit of time in the Southwest, it is not a pretty site when the water is over-subscribed and levels are dropping like a rock. Seems we had a pre-view of that here 20-30 years ago before all the deep wells. You can literally have neighbors looking down the barrels of guns at each other.

I suspect 25-30 years from now, that even the high price of Blackrock will look like a bargain to the remaining inhabitants with their desert motive yards and gardens.

Report Violation
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?