Zone defense could stop gangs at Valley high schools

By PHIL FEROLITO
Yakima Herald-Republic
Zone defense could stop gangs at Yakima Valley High Schools
ANDY SAWYER/Yakima Herald-Republic
Sunnyside school resource officer Joey Glossen patrols around Sunnyside High School as classes let out Wednesday, Dec. 9, 2009. A statewide gang task-force wants a law that would create a 1,000 foot school safety zone around schools in which gang activity would not be allowed. Glossen said such a zone could be a helpful tool in keeping children away from gang influences.

Email_black_18  E-mail           Print_black_18  Print            Talk_black_18  Comments
Advertisement

 

SUNNYSIDE, Wash. -- As lunch ends at Sunnyside High School, police descend on four teenagers standing outside an apartment complex about two blocks from the school.

The apartment manager who called police says he doesn't want them there.

The teenagers tell officers they're waiting for someone; two are known gang members displaying gang colors.

Ordering them out of the area, Sunnyside Police give the teenagers written notice that they'll be arrested for trespassing if they return.

Without a complaint from the apartment manager, police would not have been able to break up the group unless a crime had been committed.

School officials statewide hope to change that by getting legislation passed that establishes "safety zones" around public schools to prohibit gang activity.

Under the proposed law, anyone displaying colors, flashing gang signs or believed to be involved in criminal activity could be removed from areas within 1,000 feet of public schools without probable cause. If they return before being allowed back into the area, they would be subject to a civil injunction and could be arrested for trespass, a gross misdemeanor.

The proposed safety zones law is outlined in a recent 67-page report by the Gangs in Schools Task Force commissioned by the state Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction.

The report also calls for information sharing among school districts about students who are gang members, and additional school funding for prevention and intervention programs.

Law enforcement officials have expressed strong support for civil injunctions, and two years ago, state Rep. Charles Ross, R-Naches, tried to get them approved in legislation as another tool for police to use against gangs.

But the provision was removed by Democratic lawmakers who worried that the injunctions would result in racial stereotyping.

Supporters are hoping a renewed push for civil injunctions -- one that would include political backing from school districts and educators -- will be more successful. Their proposal is to use the injunctions in more limited areas near school campuses.

It's just one piece of a larger solution needed to combat a growing gang problem, said state Attorney General Rob McKenna. He's working with the Gangs in Schools Task Force to draft legislation.

"We're seeing many instances of one teenager shooting and killing another teenager, and that has changed from what we were seeing in the late 1980s and 1990s," McKenna said. "The violence is so much more obvious."

In Yakima County alone, at least eight of the nearly two dozen homicides so far in 2009 have been gang related. And shootings were dangerously close to schools twice this year in Yakima.

On Dec. 3, a 19-year-old gang member was injured when rival gang members fired more than a dozen shots in the 200 block of South Naches Avenue, where students were walking home from Washington Middle School.

And on Oct. 28, a 22-year-old man was injured in a drive-by shooting near Davis High School just as students were leaving campus.

********

A2008 state Department of Health survey -- the Healthy Youth Survey -- found that the number of high school students admitting involvement in a gang has doubled since 2002, surging from nearly 5 percent to 10 percent of the students surveyed.

Beginning in sixth grade, students are surveyed every two years. In the 2008 survey, 30,346 of the state's 46,416 students in grades six, eight, 10 and 12 participated.

In Yakima County, 594 students admitted gang membership -- 7.7 percent of the 7,638 students surveyed in grades eight, 10 and 12.

The survey also found that gang membership peaks in 10th grade, mirroring national statistics, and drops off after that.

Many students who are connected to gangs drop out or are kicked out of school by the time they reach their senior year, said Tyson Vogeler, program supervisor for school safety with the state Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction.

No one knows just how many students in public schools are involved in gangs statewide because there is no way to track them all.

"It's a huge issue, and when you're looking for numbers, they're hard to come by," Vogeler said.

The Gangs in Schools Task Force, composed of school officials, law enforcement and crime prevention representatives, was created as the result of a bill approved by state lawmakers in 2007. Its mission was to assess how gangs are affecting schools in Washington and to propose solutions.

McKenna and others believe that one potential strategy for combating gang membership may lie in California, where civil injunctions have been used by schools and law enforcement since 1994.

Authorities in Los Angeles say civil injunctions there have created a safer environment for students walking to and from school.

Studies show crime has dropped anywhere from 5 percent to 40 percent in the 41 safety zones covering roughly 100 square miles of the 500-square-mile city, said Bruce Riordan, chief of the gang division for the Los Angeles City Attorney's Office.

Civil injunctions there identify specific gangs and gang members to be excluded from areas, and they help police quickly gain control of an area when gang violence touches off, he said.

"When you have the injunction in place, police can get out immediately and enforce the injunction, quiet the neighborhood and stop the retaliation," he said.

In Washington state, enforcement of gang-free safety zones would rest on school officials and police, including student resource officers, which many schools have.

There would be both verbal and written warnings issued, depending on the level of situation, said Vogeler, who worked on the task force and proposal.

A verbal notice would exclude a person from the area for 24 hours, while a written warning would bar them for up to a year. Notices would be subject to appeal.

********

School officials and law enforcement officers say they see it often: Gang members hanging out across the street from schools and in nearby parks where students walk to and from school.

The gang task force commissioned by OSPI heard a common complaint from school officials: gangs reaching into their campuses to recruit members, said Randy Town, school safety coordinator for Education Service District 105 in Yakima.

"We've got gang houses across from schools intimidating kids," said Town, co-chairman of the gang task force that produced the report. "So we wanted to empower schools against this activity."

Although the proposed law wouldn't force any gang members to move, it could be used to keep them from bothering others in streets and on sidewalks, he said.

"I'm all for it," said Toppenish School District Assistant Superintendent John Cerna. "The farther we can keep those undesirables away, the better, because what's happening is they are waiting for our kids after school, recruiting."

Gang culture has not only overrun many neighborhoods in the Yakima Valley, it has caused even good kids with bright academic futures to get sucked into gangs, said Yakima School District Safety and Security Director Lee Maras.

For some students, it's not so much a desire to join as it is a desire to survive.

"I've had more than a few kids tell me that 'if I don't act like I'm part of this, then I'm going to get hurt,'" said Maras, also principal of McKinley Elementary School in Yakima. "I can't tell you how many times I've had parents say, 'I can't keep my kids home at night.' They're staying out all night and they're only 10 years old."

Sunnyside High School Student Resource Officer Joey Glossen said breaking up the group of teenagers at the apartments not far from the high school on Dec. 3 may have quashed recruitment efforts or a clash with rival gang members. He hasn't seen those teenagers in the area since police warned them away.

"I know that at least one of those four kids is not a gang member," he said. "But he's hanging out with them, and that concerns me."

********

A legislative bill has yet to be drafted on the safety zone, but lawmakers are interested.

"If it will create a safer environment for students at schools, I'm all for that," said Ross, who has been a leading advocate of anti-gang legislation. "I think we need to investigate and go forward with it."

Attorneys with the American Civil Liberties Union said they'd oppose any law that excludes anyone from any area without probable cause.

ACLU spokesman Doug Honig in Seattle said a law excluding a certain group of people from a public place without good reason would violate constitutional rights.

The civil liberties group would be concerned about a law that targets "not just how someone may look or speculation of what someone might do," he said.

Town, ESD 105's safety coordinator, countered that the proposed law would specifically target activity, such as any gang activity that may interfere with students or disrupt school operations.

"We realize that this may potentially be challenged by other legal authorities, but we are ready to jump in with other legal authorities and create the legal language until this meets constitutional muster," he said. "California had been challenged and had to retool bills to meet constitutional muster."

In Olympia, legislation for civil injunctions may depend on Sen. Margarita Prentice, D-Renton, who added an amendment stripping the language from the bill Ross co-sponsored in 2008. She told colleagues that civil injunction laws in California had led to racial and ethnic harassment rather than a decline in gang activity.

"This gave the opportunity for rounding up people with brown skin like mine," said Prentice, who is Latino. "This is just a reaction to our own failure (as a society). ..."

While it's not known how receptive lawmakers might be to the idea of safety zones near schools, they'll be wary of any legislation that comes with a price tag given the state's budget problems.

The task force says there would be no direct cost to implement safety zones, but they would likely seek funding to create prevention and intervention programs in schools.

Ross is still trying to get money for that 2008 gang bill, which was ultimately signed into law. The legislation he co-sponsored with Rep. Christopher Hurst, D-Enumclaw, also called for community intervention programs. The money was never allocated.

Something has to be done to put a lid on the gang problem in the state, said Ross, a member of the House Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Committee.

"I hope at the end of the legislative cycle, the Legislature as a whole does not use the budget as an excuse to not do something," he said.

 

* Phil Ferolito can be reached at 509-577-7749 or pferolito@yakimaherald.com.

 



Commentsicon2
Posted by SelahResident at 12/14/09 04:35AM        Post ID#: #20347

How about outlawing gang colors and membership altogether? We need to get tougher!

Report Violation
Posted by ChrisR at 12/14/09 05:43AM        Post ID#: #20350

If we outlawed certain colors or articles of clothing sadly our children would be going to school naked. It seems like they pick an article of clothing and turn it into something that represents them. Belts seem to be a favorite along with shoe laces..a kid can only wear white or black shoes laces in any grade and you can not wear web belts along with the flat belt buckles that you used to see our military wearing at one time. I have seen t shirts, coats, jeans, sweatshirts, and sadly the good old fashioned snot rags that our parents, grandparents and some of us grew up using.

Report Violation
Posted by Nick at 12/14/09 06:03AM        Post ID#: #20352

"The civil liberties group would be concerned about a law that targets "not just how someone may look or speculation of what someone might do," he said."

In this broad statement is the crux of our enforcement problems. Instead of calling it "profiling" when a known ganger is wearing his "colors" in an already proven fashion that has historically meant some kind of impending action he plans, it seems that the necessary "just cause" is present then and there to meet the ACLU's requirements. It isn't "profiling" when one sees a football team suited up for a game, or the high school rally squad wearing their outfits for the same game, or a band, dressed up for a parade - anyone KNOWS what they are going to do in the very near future. It shouldn't be any different when the "team" is dressed for mayhem instead of sports or public entertainment. One is no more "profiling" than the other. Yet the ACLU has called the questioning or detainment of known gang members, intent on doing harm to someone, "profiling".

This one group of liberal lawyers has caused more havoc with the Constitution they profess to uphold, than they have done good. They have effectively made victims of criminals, while the true victims of crime go ignored in their own rights. They are counter-productive to their original purpose, (I know, I was a charter member back in the 60's, when the ACLU was formed) and are abusing the original charter for the group with over-zealous prosecutions that meet personal, liberal agendas - the prime one being large fees they can extract from people they point fingers at and sue. To me, they are no different than the old Catholic Inquisition.

We need to stop these gangs in any way we can, without the interference of seditious legal threats from the zealots of the ACLU.

Report Violation
Posted by MoxeeKid at 12/14/09 06:09AM        Post ID#: #20353

Hooray for the apartment owner and the people who try to rid themselves of the gang influence.

"Law enforcement officials have expressed strong support for civil injunctions, and two years ago, state Rep. Charles Ross, R-Naches, tried to get them approved in legislation as another tool for police to use against gangs.But the provision was removed by Democratic lawmakers who worried that the injunctions would result in racial stereotyping"

"The injunction provision was removed by Democratic lawmakers who worried that the injunctions would result in racial stereotyping."

Lets do some "criminal" stereotyping and go after them with civil injunctions regardless of color.

Civil injunctions are a powerful tool.
It is like the fellow in a poker game who comes home to his wife and tells her she does not belong to him anymore.
If the gang member wants to play the drug/gang game,he needs be prepared to lose his property.... his car, his house... whatever can be seized.
Let these bums pedal their poison on foot. (and then arrest them and take their shoes)

Charlie Ross has done a great job trying to get funding and laws changed.

And.... stop electing legislators that do little more than coddle these criminals.

I don't believe the criminals should receive any benefits or living facility better that of the US military in a battle zone. (and this is what the drug culture has brought us.. a battle zone.}

Report Violation
Posted by Nick at 12/14/09 06:16AM        Post ID#: #20354

"This gave the opportunity for rounding up people with brown skin like mine," said Prentice, who is Latino. "This is just a reaction to our own failure (as a society). ..."

Meanwhile, Prentice doesn't have a clue as to what the true problems really are. She lives in Renton, not in our war-zone environment. She used her position and power as the chairman of the "Ways and Means" Committee to strip our previous gang law based upon nothing but "what-ifs" and conjecture. To me, that was a case of malfeasance in the least. She should face an ethics panel over that. There was no basis in law or precedent in what she did. Sounds like instead, she is in the pocket of hate groups such a La Raza, (the Race) and is a racist herself.

California's Civil Injunction laws have been tested already in court by the ACLU, and it should be no trick whatsoever to draft the same for us. Stop, already with the excuses and just "git 'r done"!

Report Violation
Posted by BacktoReality at 12/14/09 08:22AM        Post ID#: #20378

Reading comments like some of these explains that gang members are free to do anything they want, the police will do something "After the fact". Getting tired of the ol mantra of "Failure of our society". Why is it society's fault for gang bangers? I think all gang bangers arrested should be given one-way bus tickets to San Fran or Seattle, let them be their problem. If your waiting for Olympia to do anything about these problems, you live in a different world my friend. Citizens need to protect themselves, by any means necessary.

Report Violation
Posted by BacktoReality at 12/14/09 08:22AM        Post ID#: #20379

(This comment has been removed by a Yakima Herald-Republic moderator)

Posted by BacktoReality at 12/14/09 08:22AM        Post ID#: #20380

(This comment has been removed by a Yakima Herald-Republic moderator)

Posted by topp1993 at 12/14/09 09:13AM        Post ID#: #20395

looks and quacks its probably a duck. get rid of these kids, they are a distraction in school and only make things tougher for the kids that really want to be there.

Report Violation
Posted by thetruth at 12/14/09 10:45AM        Post ID#: #20401

Look, law enforcement and law makers have grown tolerate of gangs. For what ever reason. Why do they get to make that call. We are the ones that stand at risk. Not them in there nice neighborhoods. I say zero tolerance for gangs. Break them up, ship them out, what ever it takes. As for the ACLU, I will throw back something I hear on here a lot. There are whites, blacks and hispanics in gangs, as well as asians. So tell me how is that racial profiling?

Report Violation
Posted by Nick at 12/14/09 11:06AM        Post ID#: #20409

I'm proud of you Topp, and agree. Truth is also mostly correct as far as the ")" tolerance thing goes. One strike, you're out! Backto, I'm with you. Waiting for everyone else to do something will be a long wait.

The adage of "Lead, follow, or get out of the way" applies here in spades.

Report Violation
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?