RSSYakima needs to shave $70,000 from budget
Newly elected Dave Ettl to take council seat todayYakima Herald-Republic
E-mail
Print
Comments
More 'Local'
- Rag time again, and wastewater plant officials aren't happy
- Musicians in tune with those in need
- Prosser council to discuss renovating pool
- Check out the answers to this week's quiz
- Trails a tangible part of quality of life
- Forum takes hard look at keeping kids out of gangs
- How well did you read the YH-R last week?
YAKIMA, WASH. -- The Yakima City Council meets today to close a $70,000 gap in the city's budget for 2010.
But first it will swear in its newest member, Dave Ettl, the KIT-AM radio host who defeated council appointee Sonia Rodriguez in the Nov. 3 general election.
The ceremony is expected to get under way at 8 a.m., followed immediately by a budget-chipping session in which the council is expected to put the final touches on a proposed 2010 general-fund budget of $59.6 million that is still slightly out of whack.
The City Council has previously solved most of a projected deficit of $4 million through a combination of staff reductions and the use of $1.4 million in reserves.
Most of the 24 staff reductions will come through attrition. Three employees will be laid off, however.
But city officials say the latest revenue projections require further cuts of $70,000. That's down from a $200,000 projection just two weeks ago.
The City Council has no shortage of possible cuts to choose from, including proposals to cut all funding to a number of outside agencies -- mostly small community groups, such as Allied Arts and the Sunfair Parade -- that receive financial assistance from the city.
Other proposed cuts include the elimination of the police department's new crime analyst, a position Councilman Micah Cawley has criticized as excessively compensated at more than $111,000 a year, counting benefits.
Also on the table are proposals to restore funding for certain programs -- such as the fire department's arson dog -- which would require corresponding cutbacks.
The council's leading conservative, Bill Lover, said he still favors total elimination of funding for community groups as a matter of fiscal philosophy.
However, with the shortfall largely covered, he predicted his colleagues will stick to a previous decision to cut most outside agencies by 50 percent -- and no more.
"It's important to treat everyone the same," he said, adding, "If we weren't laying off people, it would be an entirely different observation."
After the budget session ends, the council is expected to reconvene at 6 p.m. for its regularly scheduled bi-weekly business meeting.
Read Sonia Rodriguez's comments on stepping down from the Yakima City Council in the Checks & Balances blog at yakimaherald.com.
* Chris Bristol can be reached at 509-577-7748 or at cbristol@yakimaherald.com.
Why did the Yakima Fire Department spend thousands of dollars on a fire-rescue boat when we still have budget issues? I see the Yakima Sheriff's Department has a boat that can do the job right here now.
I live in Yakima and know that most of the river is either in the county, or is not high enough throughout the year to operate a boat on. Fifty thousand dollars for one month of service? Was there any looking into this purchase or did the city just have a "use it or loose it" situation come up? Doesnt make sence to me as a tax payer.
I will be looking into this purchase. I know i will get the "...You cant put a price on human life..." political jargon but how many people are pulled off the river by rescue boat alone?? Not many i'm sure. I'm a fan of the fire department and support many of their causes.
By the way, I'm on the river a lot with my drift boat. I hit rocks many times even in the deepest channels. I have not seen anyone needing rescue by boat access only in my 30 years.
But this way they can cut people and then say because you won't allow us to raise taxes, people are out of work. Shame on you taxpayer, these folk are out of work because of you. We just did what we had to do.
Only the few will look at anything else as a waste.
Didn't the city just spend $15,000 on a piece of sh..art that nobody liked?
Report ViolationTaxpayers money should never, ever, ever be spent on art prjects of any kind This is, plain and simple, welfare for really bad artists whose work would never sell to anyone except the government.
Report ViolationThis is easy...get rid of Zais the money and common sense sponge.
Report Violation
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?
