Cow tracking-- Would Canada's model work here?

By ERIN SNELGROVE
Yakima Herald-Republic

Links
Email_black_18  E-mail           Print_black_18  Print            Talk_black_18  Comments
Advertisement

More 'Local'

  1. Rag time again, and wastewater plant officials aren't happy
  2. Musicians in tune with those in need
  3. Prosser council to discuss renovating pool
  4. Check out the answers to this week's quiz
  5. Trails a tangible part of quality of life
  6. Forum takes hard look at keeping kids out of gangs
  7. How well did you read the YH-R last week?
More Stories:   Today's News | This Week

 

YAKIMA, Wash. -- As the United States grapples with developing a national system to track diseased cattle, some here have been watching the Canadian model.

Like Australia, the program requires cattle ranchers to participate and relies on ear tags to register cattle.

But unlike Australia, the Canadian system doesn't actually track a cow's every move from birth to death.

"Whatever we move to, we have to be sure it doesn't impede commerce," said John Masswohl, director of Government & International Relations for the Calgary-based Canadian Cattlemen's Association, which represents about 90,000 beef producers.

"We aren't convinced the technology exists to read every tag every time. ... It's not all 'Star Trek' just yet."

Canada started its mandatory livestock identification program in 2002. The database is owned and controlled by the industry -- the Canadian Cattle Identification Agency -- rather than the government.

Ear tags are registered to the people who buy them. Owners are required by law to tag their cattle the first time they're moved off the farm they're born on. When the animals are slaughtered or exported, that, too, is recorded in the database.

What isn't recorded in the database is every instance of ownership changing hands, Masswohl said.

It's up to producers and owners to keep records of where the cattle went between the birth and slaughter or export. Such records are standard operating procedure for nearly all operations, according to industry officials.

"We have the bookends," Masswohl said. "In an animal health emergency, the tag gives you somewhere to look."

During such emergencies, the government has a right to access the database.

Emergencies are defined as when certain diseases or conditions are reported, such as anthrax, mange, mad cow and bovine tuberculosis. On average, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency carries out about 2,000 trace-backs per year to investigate potential outbreaks of diseases.

Locating the infected animals, though, relies on talking to producers, Masswohl said.

"The perception is the government should go to the computer, press two buttons and have an answer instantly. That doesn't exist in Canada," Masswohl said. "We have to talk to producers and rely on their records, and that's generally been pretty good."



Commentsicon2
Posted by Nick at 11/29/09 06:29AM        Post ID#: #19336

There was a joke on the Internet a while back: The gist was that our government can't seem to find over 20 million undocumented humans in the U.S., no matter where they are from, but they can find only ONE unreported cow from Canada with no problem.

Point is: can our government be trusted to track ANYTHING? They are too big and inefficient to run ANY program well.

Also, there is a better than even chance that some producers aren't as honest as others. I have found that to be the case in other ag commodities, especially in times of short supply and high market prices, where quality specifications are often overlooked by buyers. Unfortunately, business isn't what it used to be anymore where most the producers were above reproach in their integrity.

Report Violation
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?