Selah council takes another look at Matson Fruit expansion

by CHRIS BRISTOL
Yakima Herald-Republic
Selah council takes another look at Matson Fruit expansion
TJ MULLINAX/Yakima Herald-Republ
The Selah city council chamber overflows with people while the council deliberates during a rezone hearing for Matson Fruit land along North Railroad Avenue on Nov. 24, 2009. Matson has been battling the city of Selah for two years over the proposed land that was originally purchased from Otis Vineyards.

Email_black_18  E-mail           Print_black_18  Print            Talk_black_18  Comments
Advertisement

 

SELAH, Wash. -- Two years and a lawsuit after it said no, the Selah City Council all but reversed itself Tuesday on Matson Fruit's expansion plan.

The council voted unanimously to table Matson Fruit's rezoning application for a month so city staff and company officials can hammer out a development agreement that satisfies both sides.

"People, get your heads together, make something happen," Mayor Bob Jones said at the end of a quasijudicial zoning hearing that was as much about Selah's future as it was about Matson's.

At issue is Matson's request to rezone a recent property acquisition on North Railroad Avenue from commercial to industrial.

The company recently bought the undeveloped 14.83-acre parcel from Otis Vineyards with the intent of expanding its fruit-packing and cold-storage operation -- the company has been in Selah since the 1930s -- in order to stay competitive.

Fearing an erosion of the city's already tight commercial land opportunities, the City Council rejected the request in December 2007. In the process, it went against the recommendation of city staff and the city's Planning Commission.

Matson filed suit, leading to 18 months of litigation that came to a head this summer when a judge invalidated the council's decision on a technicality. (The city had been unable to produce a tape recording of an earlier hearing).

The Planning Commission promptly re-recommended approval of Matson's application, leading to Tuesday's hearing.

Selah city planner Dennis Davison told the council that city staff now opposes the rezone on the grounds that Matson would have "carte blanche" to do whatever it wants with the property and that industrial use would be incompatible with the fledgling commercial district that has sprung up along Wenas Road and South Park Drive.

"As you know, there is a shortage of industrial and commercial land in Selah," Davison said, predicting such growth would occur on the periphery of the city.

Davison's stance angered Matson attorney Mike Shinn, who said he was "appalled" city officials had reversed their once-unconditional support for the company's proposed expansion plan.

Shinn reminded the council that Matson is seeking to use only a little over 8 acres of undesirable land along railroad tracks for its expansion plan and that the remainder -- about 61/2 acres -- would be set aside for more commercial use.

He insisted that Matson does not have ulterior motives for the remaining acreage and urged the council to pursue a development agreement that spells out specific, and binding, expectations for the property.

"We'll use it for the purposes we said we would," he said.

Shinn's offer led to an increasingly frank discussion about not only Matson's needs but also the needs of a growing city like Selah.

Leading the charge was Jones, who expressed concern that Matson might change its mind about the remaining 61/2 acres once the present makeup of the council is gone.

"Councils come and go," he said. "You come back someday and the council doesn't have any history -- what happens?"

"You can save yourself that concern," Shinn shot back, again urging the council to enter into a binding agreement that spells out in detail how further development of the property will play out.

On a motion by Councilman John Tierney, seconded by Councilman Paul Overby, the council agreed to pursue a development agreement and voted 5-0 to delay a final decision until Dec. 22.

Voting yes were Tierney, Overby and fellow council members Summer Derrey, Kevin Jorgensen and Dave Smeback.

Councilman Keith Larson recused himself, saying he was both friends and competitors with the Matson family. Councilwoman Denise Nichols was absent. Along with Overby, they were the only members of the seven-person council who were in office two years ago.

After the hearing, Shinn confirmed earlier reports that Matson and city officials had been negotiating a development agreement for several months now.

He said a particularly prickly detail has been increased truck traffic -- how to accommodate it and how to ameliorate its effect on other motorists.

Nevertheless, he interpreted the council's decision as a clear signal that it wants to compromise.

"It gives both sides new impetus," he said, adding, "And we need to hurry it along."

 

* Chris Bristol can be reached at 509-577-7748 or cbristol@yakimaherald.com.

 



Commentsicon2
Posted by BacktoReality at 11/25/09 09:10AM        Post ID#: #19142

About time, Selah doesn't need anymore businesses coming into town, we need more huge concrete storage buildings. I mean who really needs the work anyway.

Report Violation
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?