Dispute leads Yakima to limit annexations

by DAVID LESTER
Yakima Herald-Republic

Links
Email_black_18  E-mail           Print_black_18  Print            Talk_black_18  Comments
Advertisement

More 'Local'

  1. Edler says strong-mayor system would provide leadership
  2. Looking back on a journalism career full of colorful characters
  3. Photo — Turning heads on cruise night
  4. As a legend and a rock'n'roller, Dylan delivers
  5. Hit-and-run driver sought in I-90 crash that left 2 injured
  6. 09/05/10 Death Notices
  7. It's a case of biomass catch-22
More Stories:   Today's News | This Week

Top Read

  1. Man accused of hitting boy, girlfriend
  2. It's a grim time for Granges
  3. Photos: John Mellencamp rocks Yakima County Stadium crowd
  4. Family dispute leads to stabbing
  5. Troopers looking for driver after hit-and-run accident near Cle Elum
  6. As a legend and a rock'n'roller, Dylan delivers
  7. Cruisers converge on downtown
More Stories:   Today's News | This Week

Emailed

  1. As a legend and a rock'n'roller, Dylan delivers
  2. Photos: John Mellencamp rocks Yakima County Stadium crowd
  3. It's a grim time for Granges
More Stories:   Today's News | This Week

Commented

  1. 09/05/10 Letters to the Editor
  2. Murray touts role in fighting gang problems
  3. Man accused of hitting boy, girlfriend
  4. It's a case of biomass catch-22
  5. Edler says strong-mayor system would provide leadership
  6. County may step up to plate for Bears
  7. Family dispute leads to stabbing
More Stories:   Today's News | This Week

 

YAKIMA, Wash. -- Major residential development in West Valley will all but cease under a new Yakima city policy that makes it tougher for developers to get sewer hookups outside city limits.

The new policy, adopted Tuesday by the City Council, represents a dramatic turnabout for the city, which has pursued an aggressive annexation policy in west Yakima.

Currently, developers can obtain approval for new homes and subdivisions under less rigorous county standards and then apply to the city to annex so their new homes have city sewer service.

Council members, voting 7-0, said they've decided there's no need to make that sewer service so easily available.

That policy had been part of a longstanding sewer agreement with Yakima County, Union Gap and Terrace Heights. But now that Yakima County is pulling out of a 35-year-old regional planning agreement, Yakima city officials say there's no need to allow sewer hookups as a trading chip for annexation.

Instead, the city will focus its limited resources on providing sewer services inside the city where that service currently is lacking.

There are some exceptions to the new policy. City Manager Dick Zais told the council service could still be provided outside the city in areas that are within 200 feet of an existing sewer line.

Bill Cook, Yakima's community and economic development director, said the council's decision is a signal to developers they should not assume they will have sewer service for their developments.

"I think development will be significantly slowed," Cook said.

Also on Tuesday, the council agreed to establish its own planning commission and not to consider any major new annexation requests until the newly released West Valley Neighborhood Plan is adopted.

Councilman Rick Ensey made it clear that city leaders aren't comfortable with a go-it-alone approach on planning but that they're ready to do so now that the county has opted to end regional planning.

"We are blazing a new trail. We are in uncharted territory," Ensey told fellow council members at the end of the afternoon study session.

He, Councilman Bill Lover and Mayor Dave Edler made the recommendations approved by the full council, all of which will be put in writing as a response letter to the Yakima County Commission.

It's all part of a disagreement between the city and Yakima County over who should control planning and development standards in the unincorporated area around the city that is likely to be annexed in the future.

The area, known as the city's urban growth area, extends in an arc around the city's western boundary that reaches as far as 112th Avenue.

The city's westernmost city limit is 96th Avenue in the area of Summitview Avenue and Tieton Drive.

On the east end of the city, the urban growth area includes Terrace Heights.

For 32 years, a seven-member regional planning commission has made recommendations to the Yakima City Council and Yakima County Commission on land-use policy and comprehensive plan amendments in the urban area.

County commissioners have been critical of regional planning, viewing it as a process that gives too much power to planners and not enough to political leaders.

Commissioner Mike Leita said the problems have resulted in gaps in sewer service in the urban area and substandard roads leading to major developments like the Apple Tree Resort, a golf course and residential development on Occidental Road in west Yakima.

Commissioners have given notice the county will withdraw from the regional planning agreement on Dec. 31.

Leita, using the same kind of language that Ensey employed, said the change is a chance to develop a new city-county relationship that was lacking under the old agreement.

"I'm pleased with the council's willingness to be open. I'm sure there is some hesitancy," Leita said. "It's always tough to leave home, if you will. But that is where we are. We are embarking on a new adventure."

For developers, though, there is clearly nervousness.

Joe Walsh, director of governmental affairs for the Central Washington Home Builders Association, told the City Council the development community is willing to help bring the city and county back together on regional planning.

"If the development community could play a role in pulling the city and county together, we'd like to offer that," he said.

 

* David Lester can be reached at 509-577-7674 or dlester@yakimaherald.com.

 



Commentsicon2
Posted by Nick at 11/18/09 04:51AM        Post ID#: #18399

The City had a planning commission for many years, until it decided to abolish it. The attempt at an "urban" planning commission, that was supposed to oversee the urban area, that no-mans land between city and county boundaries, worked fairly well until the Growth Management Act was adopted and their functions all but ceased, (The Act ruled what could and could not be done in the way of zoning). After the act, planning commission rulings were often ignored or overruled by the politicians. I know, I was a member of both commissions.

I see the problem of jurisdiction as the GMA, more than the need/lack for an independent planning commission. There are many parts of the GMA that take away landowner rights and amount to nothing but a "government taking", at least by their impacts on private development.

Both county and city should withdraw from the GMA, (if it were possible) in addition to establishing a citizen-member planning commission that can give a forum for people who want to build. The process worked well, and can again.

Report Violation
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?