Agencies must prove they can work together on clean water


Yakima Herald-Republic Editorial Board

Links
Email_black_18  E-mail           Print_black_18  Print            Talk_black_18  Comments
Advertisement

More 'Opinion'

  1. Ruling underscores school districts' need for levies
  2. State must assure safety of its most vulnerable citizens
  3. Enforcement is key to any panhandling decision
  4. Bid to unionize child-care centers still a bad idea
  5. Confidential bank oversight won't return confidence
  6. Here's a chance to make a difference for heart attack victims
  7. CWU's plea for stable state funding is sensible (and unlikely)
More Stories:   Today's News | This Week

 

This editorial appears in the Nov. 17, 2009, Yakima Herald-Republic.

The fact that two state agencies responsible for clean water and livestock have agreed to a broad outline for coordinated regulation is good news for the Yakima Valley. It's a step in the right direction.

But the question still remains: Can water quality be enforced when multiple agencies are responsible? That remains to be seen.

Earlier this month, the departments of Ecology and Agriculture signed what has been termed a "roadmap" detailing their responsibilities in managing manure to avoid water pollution. The agreement followed months of discussion between the two agencies.

Ecology and Agriculture were previously stung by criticism over how they had handled complaints about water contamination due to possible infiltration from the discharge of manure from feedlots and dairies. This criticism came to light following a series of investigative stories by Leah Beth Ward, a reporter for this newspaper, which revealed widespread contamination of drinking-water wells in the Lower Valley.

The division of responsibilities for dealing with water quality complaints aligns with current enforcement duties for the two agencies. Ecology will focus on taking action against livestock operations that imperil human health or the environment. Agriculture will continue to work on its livestock nutrient management program -- ensuring that dairies maintain what it calls "best practices" for disposing manure.

The roadmap offers the hope of consistent oversight. That certainly has not been the state's track record in other areas, for example, handling the management of natural resources. In all, 14 different agencies claim some sort of responsibility. The governor has called for reforming this tangled web of management. That effort is still ongoing.

What the future holds is clearly in the hands of Ecology and Agriculture.

Coordinated enforcement must be achieved as it relates to the oversight of drinking-water wells. Residents living in the Lower Yakima Valley, as well as the livestock and dairy industries, can't afford to see this roadmap between the two agencies result in any more detours.


* Members of the Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board are Michael Shepard, Bob Crider, Spencer Hatton and Karen Troianello.



Commentsicon2
Posted by mikelibbee at 11/17/09 08:13PM        Post ID#: #18384

"Best Practices" is a euphemism for "as little as possible to get beyond the law."

Report Violation
Posted by KES at 12/10/09 10:03PM        Post ID#: #20105

This water contamintation did not happen overnight. It has been ongoing for 50 or more years. People need to step back and look at how much agriculture and technology in general have imporved. The nutrient management plans and waste management systems are far better and will only continue to get better. Attacking daires and feedlot that are operating today is not the way to fix this problem. But making sure they are doing their part to ensure water contamination has stopped should be the focus.

Report Violation
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?