Seeing double trouble with second group home next door
YAKIMA HERALD-REPUBLIC
More 'Local'
- West Valley schools run late today
- Engineering students have designs on the future
- Railroad underpass bids pass muster
- Don't flip the switch lightly: Power rates are going up
- Appeals court rules city was justified in firing Rummel
- Up to 50 Davis scholarships available
- Union Gap will switch to four-day work week
YAKIMA Wash. -- Having one group home in the neighborhood was bad enough, says Alex Santillanes. Now he's got two, side by side.
"It's like, when's the third one coming?" says Santillanes, a well known gang intervention consultant who lives in the 1400 block of West Chestnut Avenue, one of Yakima's most venerable neighborhoods.
Fearing a group-home proliferation in his neighborhood, Santillanes recently complained to the City Council, which in turn asked city staff to investigate.
Santillanes and his wife, Virginia, say their opposition to a second group home comes from years of negative experience with the first. They have lived there for 30 years.
Located at 1408 W. Yakima Ave., the first group home started out in the early 1990s as a drug treatment facility and briefly morphed into a men's shelter before settling in as "clean and sober" housing for women in recovery.
The home is operated by Triumph Treatment Services, which calls it Sage House. It shares a common alley with the Santillanes home, which has a lot to do with the friction.
The Santillanes' say traffic in the alley has been a constant source of frustration, as is loitering, smoking and boisterous behavior. Even before the second group home cropped up, they were worried about the resale value of their own home, a charming Craftsman built in 1910.
"How are we going to be able to sell our place?" asks Virginia Santillanes. "Would you want to live next to a group home?"
Now there's another one.
Alex Santillanes says he first got wind of it a few weeks ago when he noticed there appeared to be some construction work going on at the home next to Sage House.
After poking around a bit, he learned the house had recently been sold. Incredibly, it was set to become clean-and-sober housing too. Alarmed, he alerted city officials, who paid the site at 1406 W. Yakima Ave. a visit.
In short order, code officers determined the construction work -- actually demolition -- was being done without the proper permits. The house had been subdivided into a triplex in 1982, and the new occupants wanted it to be more like a regular single-family home.
The permit problem was easily remedied. Beyond that, however, city officials warn that federal law and rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court severely limit regulation of clean-and-sober housing.
"It's not a zoning issue, and there's no land-use authority," says Bill Cook, the city's director of economic development. "By law, we cannot treat them any differently than we would a single family."
The second group home is operated by Oxford House Inc., a national nonprofit that since 1975 has planted roughly 1,400 clean-and-sober houses across the country.
Stacie Anderson, a regional spokeswoman for the group, says there are 207 Oxford Houses in Washington state alone. In fact, seven of them are in Yakima.
"We've been here for awhile," she says. "We're just under the radar."
Oxford House homes are run by the residents, who in turn enforce a zero-tolerance policy against substance abuse that is the cornerstone of the group's philosophy, Anderson says.
Following Santillanes' most recent complaint, city staff has researched and prepared a report on the matter. That report will be presented to the City Council and be available for discussion at Tuesday night's regularly scheduled city council meeting.
Councilman Bill Lover, interviewed late last week before he had seen the report, expressed concern about the situation.
"We're importing pover-ty and problems," Lover said, "but I don't want to be a destination for this stuff."
Lover was also surprised to learn that this would be the seventh such house in Yakima.
"It looks like there's a business model here that's getting bigger and bigger," Lover said. "We've got enough problems as it is."
Like Sage House, the new Oxford House home is restricted to women in recovery. Anderson predicts the Santillanes' opposition to the home, newly dubbed Portia Park House for a nearby park on Yakima Avenue, will evaporate in time.
"If a dope house springs up next door, we're going to be the first ones to call," she says. "We end up being the best neighbors on the block."
Ironically, Anderson says she had no idea when she signed a lease on the house that another group home was next door.
The same goes for the new owner of the home, Dave McFadden, who says he had a confusing conversation with Alex Santillanes early on in which Santillanes repeatedly referenced long-standing grievances with a group home that sounded different from his property.
"I didn't even know what he was talking about," McFadden says. "I'm like, 'Are you sure we're talking about the same thing?' I was dumbfounded when I realized we were talking about two different places."
McFadden says the lease with Oxford House was negotiated with the previous owner shortly before he bought the property in August and that he and his wife have since come to regret the decision to close the sale.
McFadden is president of New Vision-Yakima County Development Association, the county's economic development arm. He stresses that he and his wife bought the property as a personal investment opportunity and that the purchase has nothing to do with New Vision.
He says he has mixed feelings about the group home but, due to provisions in the lease, isn't in a position to pull the plug on it.
"You don't buy a rental property to get a headache," he says, adding, "On the other hand, they're taking very good care of the house."
Meanwhile, the Santillanes' say they're very interested in hearing what the city has to say from a policy standpoint about group homes.
Alex Santillanes says he's not too worried about creating a stir.
"I don't think Dave McFadden would want to live next to two group homes, and I'm sure nobody on the City Council would either," he says. "They'd probably be yelling, 'Not in our neighborhood' just as loudly."
* Chris Bristol can be reached at 577-7748 or cbristol@yakimaherald.com.
This is easy - sell you house to the same outfit to use as a group home.
What happened to "single family residential" zoning? Perhaps the planner need to seek a separate classification for group homes in general, since every time one is established, there is a huge fight in the neighborhood.
At least then, answers and regulations could be available in advance. Such would stop the bickering and expensive delays to builders and owners alike, once a location is approved, instead of after the fact.
This is a pathetic story - here we have two group homes with occupants that are clean and sober, trying to become healthy contributing members of society and their neighbor "across the alley" is concerned about his property value and Bill Lover is concerned with importing more problems in the community. What am I missing? Is Mr. Lover suggesting that clean and sober housing will add to our community's problems? Unless I'm a total moron I would suggest just the opposite.
Report ViolationI agree with YakRob. This is a a pathetic story. Talk about someone who is paranoid. If these people didn't have then stepdown homes a lot of them would go back to using. I wouldn't care if I had one next door to me. I would likely ask if there was anything I could do to help out since I have been clean and sober for 20 years. He should be thankful instead of complaining.
Report ViolationI can't stress enough the importance of having clean and sober houses available for recovering addicts and alchoholics. Clean and sober homes have been in Yakima for many many years. I have personally visited at least 5 or 6 over the course of 20 plus years. These homes provide more than just a place to sleep. They give hope and support and in many cases a chance to turn a troubled life around. They provide a safe surrounding for addicted mothers to get clean and eventually be reunited with their children. I know for a fact that these homes save lives. In my opinion we need more clean and sober homes, not less. By the way, these homes welcome donations... furniture, small appliances, mens clothing especially....winter boots and coats as these guys do alot of walking to meetings and job hunting. Be part of the solution...get out of your comfort zones and find out where these homes are located and ask what you can do to help.
Report ViolationYeah, I figured this would be a one sided article just by reading the title. Come on, YHR, report a story on the successes of group homes and how people in recovery are helped by these Yakima places. This should have been worked into this story. Yakima has plenty of problems but I see group homes as a part of the solution. Maybe the residents do not always show model citizenship but maybe if you were friendly to them and overlooked a few of their flaws then they could learn something from you. All you can be is a good example of something. Do you wish to be a complainer or solution finder? If you don't like living next to it then move. The residents in the group home might not have that option.
Report ViolationWriting from Boston, Mass.
I write because I lived in a group home on 7th St. for a year and independently in an apartment on 3rd St. for 2 years, 17 years ago, in Yakima. Alex Santillanes is a knowledgeable, and sounds like a well liked community treatment services gang intervention consultant. In the current treatment environment, group homes are challenged with enabling positive outcomes within the group home community. I presume at least in part that the home on W. Yakima Ave. is operated by a human services agency, which may have a staff in the home that is licensed by DSHS, has a policy and rules that direct and guide living, eating, residence upkeep by occupants, and has a no alcohol and drug use protocol. I know that the group home residents struggle personally, but there is support from the organizing association, and if there is staff, then they assist residents. Residents also support each other. In addition, DSHS plays a role in producing results in the group home.
I have gone on from being a group home resident to staffing a community treatment residence in Cambridge, Mass. Group homes have a lot of backing from the community. The occupants face issues that require demanding interventions medically, psychologically and from the courts.
I will say that through my treatment, I have embraced these interventions successfully. These interventions that I have brought on board in my life will be the challenge for the current group home occupants to take on to yield a safe, stable and productive home in the community. Addictions treatment group homes primarily (and secondarily) use a health care intervention, and as with many such interventions, there is a large stigma against adverse effects of medications. The stigma can be overcome, and the medication treatment can have their desired effect with a successful outcome. Community residences (group homes) have done a respectable job over the past 30 to 40 years. With the help of the community, these group homes can be accepted by neighborhoods and can be successful.
I agree with overfifty and in part with YakRob and SweetLynn5849. Addiction group homes play a part in successfully treating and reintegrating substance users into their homes, families and communities.
I am not sure why this is such a big deal. I lived on 11th Ave for a while and the area where these homes are located is comprised mostly of apartments, commercial offices and multifamily homes.
We need recovery homes to help people get back on their feet again. I concur with the manager of the new house. These places are typically quiet and the residents are considerate members of the neighborhood.
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?

RSS
E-mail
Print
Comments