RSSSuit names Toppenish police chief, officer
Yakima Herald-Republic
E-mail
Print
Comments
More 'Local'
- Home-detention inmate walks away from residence
- Two suspects from Mattawa arrested in homicide case
- Photojournal — Li'l biker
- Wapato community awards banquet, auction on tap
- Two Highland fires investigated as suspicious
- Guitars featured at YVCC jazz show Yakima
- City prosecutor to run for District Court judge
TOPPENISH -- A Toppenish resident is suing the police chief and an officer for jailing him when he attempted to file a complaint against the officer.
Alex Mejia is suing police Chief Adam Diaz and Officer J. Brownell in Yakima County Superior Court for false arrest, abuse of police process and negligence.
Neither Diaz nor Brownell were at the police department Friday and they couldn't be reached for comment, a police dispatcher said.
City Attorney Gary Cuillier, who began working for Toppenish this month, said he wasn't aware of the lawsuit that was filed Oct. 12.
The lawsuit claims that on Sept. 9, 2007, Brownell wouldn't allow Mejia to file a complaint against two men who tried to serve him with court papers at a 7-Eleven store and kept him from leaving the store.
When police were called to the store, Brownell refused to take Mejia's statement and instead handed him the court papers from the two men and said "you've just been served," according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit does not specify what kind of legal action the court papers involved.
The officer allowed the other two men to leave the store without incident, the lawsuit said.
Mejia is well known in Toppenish as a frequent critic of city government.
When he went to the police department to complain about Brownell, the officer escorted him out of the station, the lawsuit said.
When Mejia returned to the police department the following day to complain about Brownell, he was arrested by Diaz, a sergeant at the time, and Brownell on charges of making false or misleading statements to police, the lawsuit said.
A judge on Oct. 10, 2007, dismissed the charges against Mejia.
Mejia's attorney, Bill Pickett, said police violated his client's rights and describes it as a "constitutional case."
"It's the police's responsibility to protect the rights of citizens," Pickett said.
"If they violate those rights, it's the citizen's responsibility to go after them and make then do what they're supposed to do. When they violate that duty, they're going to be taken to task."
Sounds like an issue of a citizen, (if he is one) and a small-time attorney,trying to make a name and a buck or two. The guy seems to be making a tempest in a teapot because he didn't want to be served legal papers. He got served anyway, and now he wants to make a big stink.
Boo-Hoo for him. Perhaps his attorney should educate his client in aspects of the law instead of seemingly using him to take a ride on the money express claiming a "civil rights" violation.
Nick-"Perhaps his attorney should educate his client in aspects of the law instead of seemingly using him to take a ride on the money express claiming a "civil rights" violation."
That doesn't pay nearly as well hahah
Here we have another incident of a police department with a "I am god mentality". How dare a citizen even attempt to point out that they have rights and once again the small mentality of the Yakima Valley condemns the citizen for expressing his disappointment in the actions of public servants. Only in a small town can a person voluntarily go into a police station and because of egos and spite be arrested. This is a lawsuit that the small town attorney needs to be worried about, because bigger venues have been penalized for violating the people's rights.
Report Violation
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?
