RSSPublic would regain control over government growth
I-1033 debate -- PROYakima Herald-Republic
E-mail
Print
Comments
More 'Opinion'
- Ruling underscores school districts' need for levies
- State must assure safety of its most vulnerable citizens
- Enforcement is key to any panhandling decision
- Bid to unionize child-care centers still a bad idea
- Confidential bank oversight won't return confidence
- Here's a chance to make a difference for heart attack victims
- CWU's plea for stable state funding is sensible (and unlikely)
We want to start by thanking the 315,000 citizens who voluntarily signed Initiative 1033's petitions, as well as the thousands of volunteers throughout the state who made that possible.
Here's what we're debating with I-1033: How fast should the government grow and who should decide? I-1033 takes the position that the public sector should grow at the same rate as the private sector -- unless voters OK a bigger increase -- and it should be the citizens, and not the politicians, who decide.
I-1033 brings back successful policies passed by the voters previously. In 1993, during tough economic times, voters approved Initiative 601, which put reasonable limits on government's fiscal policies. I-601 established a sustainable rate for government to grow, saying it could grow at the inflation rate plus population growth with faster growth requiring voter approval.
And I-601 worked very well for 12 years until 2005 when Gov. Chris Gregoire and the Democrats got rid of its growth limit. Removing I-601's reasonable fiscal discipline and policies resulted directly in a massive $9 billion deficit.
Repealing I-601's limit in 2005 allowed them to take their budget on a fiscal roller coaster, overextending themselves in good times -- creating unsustainable budgets -- which inevitably made the bad times even worse. I-1033 gets us off that fiscal roller coaster by re-establishing I-601's same reasonable allowance for growth while permitting higher increases with voter approval.
I-601 worked; it can work again with the passage of I-1033.
So what happens to excess tax revenues that government collects above I-1033's limit? First, a fixed percentage of tax revenue is transferred into the constitutionally protected rainy day fund. Beyond that, the remainder of excess tax revenues gets refunded back to taxpayers via lower property taxes.
Under I-1033, everyone's property taxes will be reduced. Struggling working families and fixed-income senior citizens desperately need relief from our state's crushing property tax burden. Washington shouldn't be a state where only rich people can afford a home. I-1033 provides needed, long-overdue property tax relief.
Putting a reasonable limit on the growth of government, like I-601 previously did, gives politicians the excuse to say "no" to the special interest groups and encourages them to finally start prioritizing and reforming government.
Opponents have no alternative to I-1033 to lower property taxes. Opponents have no alternative to I-1033 to get government off the fiscal roller coaster. Opponents want us to trust the politicians, despite their insatiable appetite for higher taxes. Opponents ignore the 16 years of positive history with Initiative 601 in Washington state, preferring instead to talk about different tax limits in California, Colorado and other states. Opponents are against I-1033 because it allows the people, and not the politicians, to decide how fast the government should grow and how big a tax burden we can afford.
Opponents know that Washington's 12 years under I-601 worked and that's why they want to distract everyone by bringing up other states. But other states have totally different proposals and policies that are unique to them.
Washington state has its own experience with I-601 -- 12 years with it, four years without it. And what happened without I-601's fiscal discipline? A fiscal roller coaster ending in a $9 billion deficit. I-1033 makes sure that doesn't happen again.
Opponents want higher taxes and a state income tax. Opponents are against any limit on government's power to take as much as they want from the taxpayers.
Property taxes keep going higher and higher and government keeps getting bigger and bigger. The people are losing control. I-1033 allows the state, counties and cities to grow, but at a rate that citizens can control and taxpayers can afford.
I-1033 is needed now more than ever.
We're very proud of our supporters and very hopeful that voters will support controlling the growth of government and lowering property taxes by approving Initiative 1033 in November.
* Tim Eyman, a Mukilteo resident who grew up in Yakima's West Valley, is co-sponsor of I-1033 and heads up Voters Want More Choices, a grass-roots taxpayer protection organization.
over government growth
In a world where our State legislature is controlled by fiscally responsible leaders, anything can work. My only question to this measure is: Property taxes are linked to property values. If those values go up, as they have sky-rocketed the past ten years, how can one expect to receive meaningful and lower assessments? Or, would those increases in property value be considered a "cost of living increase" and therefore, can be legally kept in the loop?
Meanwhile, the LAST thing I would accept is a state income tax. We are already one of the most heavily-taxed states in the Union, and I can't even imagine having sales taxes repealed.
As to "trusting" a politician, HAHAHAHA. You must be joking. I have been burned on that one time and again, whatever party is in power. I will NEVER trust another politician as long as I live.
Interesting choice of picture, especially compared to the professional portrait the YHR used for the tax-and-spend liberal opposing I-1033.
The YHR just can't contain their liberal bias, no matter how quickly they lose subscribers.
The unfortunate thing about our elected official is that many of them run as conservatives and then spend freely. I saw this with newhouse and Honeyford. Newhouse now being secretary of state under a democrat shows that he was not a true conservative nor a true republican. A TRUE republican is a person who wants less governement, less laws on the books. Now Chandler, Honeyford and Newhouse all voted for the peanuts law in our school system. Another useless law on the books and out so-called conservative leaders of the lower valley voted to put them on the books. As our legislature and elected leaders vote for a law; then this state should be taking five laws off the books for each new one added. I am a backer of Eyman and as I said before, thing he needs cloned! We have all to many conservatives and liberals alike wanting everything for nothing. Our hosoital, schools, Port of Sunnyside and city of Sunnyside are all under the ignorant liberals spend philosophy. It seems all these entities in the lower valley want to represent taxing districts but not the taxpayer. We are seeing this state wide! It is time for it to STOP.
Report Violation
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?
