Posted on Sunday, October 18, 2009

Criminal justice sales tax: 'If we lose this, it will be devastating'
by DAVID LESTER
Yakima Herald-Republic

 

YAKIMA, Wash. -- During the 2004 campaign, backers of Proposition 1 promised they would use a proposed sales tax increase to fight crime and handle more criminal cases. Wash. --

The campaign coincided with another bruising budget drama playing out at the courthouse: fewer prosecutors to handle the growing caseload, fewer sheriff's deputies on the road, and fewer beds occupied at the Juvenile Justice Center in Yakima.

"We saw the train coming at us. We saw county revenues going down and we were being squeezed every year," recalled Dan Fessler, head of the county office that supplies defense attorneys to indigent offenders. "The demand far exceeded the resources available."

Voters listened, and on Nov. 2 of that year agreed to increase Yakima County's sales tax by three-tenths of a cent for six years. This year, that will amount to an extra $36 in sales tax for each of the county's 225,000 residents.

With that money, police departments put more officers on the streets and in the schools, updated equipment, and outfitted new police cars with their combined 40 percent share of the tax revenue. The county received the other 60 percent and focused much of it on tackling a backlog of criminal cases that had reached 1,500.

Agencies receiving the money promised to account for every dollar they spent.

A Yakima Herald-Republic analysis of the public spending since the tax went into effect in early 2005 -- all $36 million of it -- found that supporters have kept their word to spend the money only on law enforcement and to focus on expansion of services.

One exception is the Sheriff's Office, where there are fewer commissioned officers today than there were in 2005 because, Sheriff Ken Irwin says, the cost of wages, health care premiums, gasoline and vehicles are rising faster than the funds available.

The number of deputies has fallen from 71 in 2005 to 66 this year.

The department's budget, meanwhile, has grown, from $7.9 million in 2005 to $9.1 million this year.

The starting wage for deputies has, as a result of contract agreements, risen from $40,934 in 2007 to $45,181 this year. The county has agreed to boost salaries to $48,417 by July 2010.

To hire, train and outfit a deputy sheriff costs close to $70,000 for the first year, Hagarty said.

The 2004 approval by Yakima County voters bucked a trend of failed tax measures over the previous decade. The campaign was led largely by Republicans, including Irwin and then-Prosecutor Ron Zirkle.

In five years, the sales tax money has allowed county departments to build on what they received from the general fund budget -- to expand programs and staff, add more prosecutors and defense attorneys in the courts, hold more juvenile offenders, and open a District Court office in Grandview to serve Lower Valley residents.

The city of Yakima, among other things, is paying for five patrol officers, a detective and a forensic lab manager with the $1.55 million it's received. And smaller communities such as Naches and Harrah have been able to contract for more hours with the Sheriff's Office for patrol services.

In addition to promising what would be done with the sales tax money, county commissioners made another promise: Tax proceeds would be kept separate from general county government revenues and operations.

That also has happened.

The move was designed to provide a clear accounting of where the money went. County departments that share in the revenues decided how the money would be allocated.

There were some hiccups at first.

Zirkle questioned plans by Selah and Wapato to use some of their sales tax revenue for programs outside of law enforcement. Wapato, for example, wanted to use the money to operate a youth center, which it said would divert youth from crime.

That issue was settled when Attorney General Rob McKenna concluded the ballot language of Proposition 1 was clear: The money could be spent only on law enforcement.

This year, Selah is spending its share of the three-tenths sales tax for one police officer and a school resource officer; Wapato is paying off the purchase of nine vehicles, including a jail van.

Supporters are now back before the voters, seeking to renew the three-tenths sales tax for an additional six years beginning in 2011.

 

'We did what we said we were going to do," said Harold Delia, an administrative consultant for Yakima County courts and the Juvenile Justice Center.

Officials say failure in the Nov. 3 election would put the county and cities back where they were before the sales tax went into effect.

At that time, the back end of the system, which starts with cops on the street -- prosecutors, defense attorneys, and court staff members -- was near collapse.

Fessler said the system couldn't handle the number of cases referred with the existing staff, evidenced by that backlog, which has been reduced since 2008 to fewer than 1,000.

Echoing Delia, Fessler said the three-tenths tax has made the system more efficient -- and effective.

"It certainly has saved the county justice system from failing up to this point in time," he said.

The heavy caseload was a symptom of a problem that pervades economically depressed areas like Yakima County, where poverty breeds crime.

"Whether we like it or not, the demographics of this county drive a significant criminal justice set of issues," Fessler said.

While the additional tax revenue opened a new source of money for court and police operations, most cities and county agencies have come to rely on it.

County commissioners over the past five years have allocated more general fund money annually to the prosecutor, sheriff, clerk, assigned counsel and the courts to pay for operations and cover rising costs.

But funding has never kept pace with caseloads.

Mark Ware, assistant police chief for Grandview, said the three-tenths tax now accounts for 20 percent of his department's $1 million budget.

"In an ideal world, I'd like to say we would come up with that money" if voters decline to renew the additional tax, he said.

"To be honest, there is no way we could."

Derrick Perez is one of three line officers the city of Toppenish was able to hire last year under the three-tenths of a cent sales tax.

Perez, 34, is now the sole breadwinner for his wife and two daughters after his wife was laid off at the Wapato Police Department.

Should voters decide not to renew the county tax, Perez, Toppenish's only K9 officer, would be out of a job at the end of next year.

He said he would try to find work someplace else.

"I have no idea what I would do. I have two degrees, both of which are more toward the law enforcement side of this work. That is what I would try to do," he said.

During the 16 days he was on duty in September, Perez responded to 69 calls for service and made 31 arrests.

Perez's chief, Adam Diaz, knows what he would likely have to do with his 17-officer staff if the tax is not renewed.

"When you lose three people, you are moving people from detective to the road," Diaz said. "It really affects your ability to follow up on crime and do things like narcotics. The county will take a hit, certainly, if it doesn't pass."

Some types of cases likely wouldn't be pursued by the prosecutor's office, as the tax currently pays for 11 deputy prosecutors out of a total staff of 34 attorneys.

Although he hasn't considered what he would do if the measure fails, county Prosecutor Jim Hagarty speculates that crimes such as possession of small amounts of drugs and some property crimes wouldn't be prosecuted.

"We will do everything possible to continue to prosecute everything we can, but at the end of the day, we will be limited," he said.

Hagarty and Irwin are co-chairing the campaign to renew the tax.

Irwin describes the losses should the tax fail as catastrophic to efforts to reduce crime.

That is part of the message in a campaign to renew the tax.

If the measure fails, Irwin said he would have to lay off a quarter of his 66 commissioned officers.

 

Maintaining the current level of service in the future -- even with the three-tenths tax -- won't be easy.

The county's ability to provide general fund money for public safety is under assault this year from declining revenues and still-growing costs, so many agencies are looking toward the additional sales tax as a potential cushion to lessen the impact of cuts that are likely in 2010.

But the three-tenths itself is feeling the strain.

Just as a down economy has hurt sales tax income for general government, it also has cut the three-tenths money. From a peak of $8.3 million in 2008, the fund is projected to decline to $8.1 million this year.

Whether the economic downturn will ease in 2010 is unknown.

Hagarty said the people he has hired under three-tenths will continue to work regardless of what cuts he will sustain in his 2010 budget because their salaries are coming from a separate pot of money.

"The three-tenths will let me maintain that service. At the end of the day, the reduction in the budget won't cause the loss of those people," he said.

Delia, the administrative consultant for Yakima County courts and juvenile, said possible budget cuts imposed by county commissioners to balance the 2010 budget could force him to close one detention pod at the Juvenile Justice Center on Jerome Avenue in Yakima.

The three-tenths tax pays to operate 28 center juvenile beds, and county general tax revenues support another 28 beds. The 96-bed center has an average daily census of 43 detainees, though the population has spiked at times to as many as 59.

The rest of the center's beds are not being used, and there is no money budgeted to operate them.

Delia said a significant cut in the center's general fund budget could force capacity down to 42 beds.

 

Those in the private sector working to improve public safety are expressing support for the three-tenths tax renewal.

Bill Dolsen is president of the Dolsen Companies and incoming chairman of the Committee for Safe Yakima Valley Communities, a nonprofit grass-roots group formed in 2006 to build coalitions among community groups to combat crime and drugs.

"If we lose this, it will be devastating. I feel strongly about that," said Dolsen, who describes himself as generally not a fan of tax increases. "If you listen to the people in law enforcement, this will hurt them a lot."

"It will hurt the town, unfortunately," he added.

 

* David Lester can be reached at 509-577-7674 or dlester@yakimaherald.com.

 

 

WHAT THE TAX PAYS FOR
Here’s what the three-tenths of a cent criminal justice sales tax is paying for this year* by jurisdiction:

• Sheriff, $1.38 million: 17 deputies and cars** (14 are road deputies, 3 are assigned to a multiagency violent crimes task force)
• Prosecutor, $967,000: 11 attorneys, 3 staff members
• Clerk, $189,000: 4 deputy clerks, jury selection software
• Assigned Counsel, $1.125 million: 13 staff and contract attorneys, 2 clerical positions
• Superior Court, $308,243: 1 court commissioner, 2 court reporters, 2 family court staff members (1,500-case criminal backlog reduced 38%)
• District Court, $468,719: Lower Valley District Court, 3 court staff members, 1 security guard
• Juvenile Justice, $662,637: 12 detention officers, 2 probation officers, 28 juvenile beds (56 total operated)
• Yakima Police, $1.55 million: 5 patrol officers, 1 detective, 1 forensic lab manager, 3 vehicles**
• Sunnyside, $280,000: 4 officers, half-time public defender
• Toppenish, $175,000: 3 officers, 1 corrections officer
• Grandview, $170,000: 2 officers, part-time school resource officer
• Selah, $140,000: 1 officer, 1 school resource officer
• Union Gap, $110,000: 1 support personnel, 9 vehicles**
• Wapato, $88,000: 9 vehicles**
• Granger, $55,000: 1 vehicle**
• Zillah, $50,000: 1 officer
• Mabton, $40,000: 2 patrol vehicles**
• Tieton, $23,000: 2 patrol vehicles** and video equipment
• Moxee, $20,000: 1 officer partially funded
• Naches, $17,000: Contract hours for a deputy sheriff
• Harrah, $12,000: Contract hours for a deputy sheriff

Totals: $7.8 million,*** 96 positions

* Amounts are estimated because total sales tax receipts for 2009 will not be available until the first quarter of 2010.
** Vehicle purchases have occurred during the years the tax has been collected. Annual proceeds are used to pay off those purchases.
*** Some funds from the total projected 2009 revenue of $8.1 million are being kept in reserve and not being spent in 2009.

— Sources: Yakima County and individual police departments

 

 

Criminal justice sales tax
GORDON KING/Yakima Herald-Republic
Toppenish Police Department Officer Derrick Perez checks for outstanding warrants on a man found sleeping outside a convenience store in Toppenish Oct. 15, 2009. Perez was hired by the city using using three-tenths of a cent sales tax money and would lose his job if the tax is not renewed by voters next month.

Email_black_18  E-mail           Print_black_18  Print            Talk_black_18  Comments
Advertisement

More 'Local'

More Stories:   Today's News | This Week
Commentsicon2
Posted by RonStevens at 10/17/09 11:51PM        Post ID#: #15499

For the city of yakima;with the guestimate of $20,000
per vehicle * 3 vehicles is $60,000.The totaL yAKIMA CITY
FUNDING VIA THIS TAX WAS $1,550,000.
$1,550,000- $60,000,leaves you with $1,490,000 for
the seven personnel(5 patrol officers,1 detective & 1 forensic
lab manager.The price per person for one year is $212,857.
That does not pass the smell test.It sounds like government beauracracy using the same paradigm of excessive spending;
since the money is for law and justice,the sheeple and the press just lets it pass,without evaluating.

Report Violation
Posted by lobo at 10/18/09 01:46AM        Post ID#: #15502

This tax is a failure presented by liars & frauds at the county and cities. Yes something should be done, but this tax and the programs it supports are NOT working. Reject this and force the county and cities to come up with a plan that actually makes us safer in this community.

RonStevens, YPD bought Tahoes for $40K plus customization (lights, cage, graphics, radios, computers). They've replaced the originals once. http://www.gmfleet.com/government/products/police.jsp


Report Violation
Posted by OddThomasFan at 10/18/09 08:02AM        Post ID#: #15510

Money kept in reserve and not being spent? In these "bad economic times" it seems a bit strange that the county can't keep up with costs yet still are able to bank some of the money from our taxes. My budget doesn't work like that, does yours?

Report Violation
Posted by bornandraised at 10/18/09 09:56AM        Post ID#: #15514

RonStevens

I do agree that the overall numbers don't add up if this is indeed all that was purchased with $1.55 million, but I think some of your estimates are off as well. $20K for a police car I bet isn't 1/3 of the actual price and the "customization" lobo referenced is called making it a police car. I had a friend that built police cars and when they show up from the factory they have no police equipment in them at all; no cage, lights, siren, or computers. And in the days that everyone needs police dash cam videos for liability, that stuff is far from free. My money says a standard police car is $60k-$80k each.

Yes, the overall numbers are still way off and I think it should be accounted for and reported to the penny. Perhaps someone should speak at the next council meeting to ask the council to look into it and report.

Report Violation
Posted by Starman at 10/18/09 10:56AM        Post ID#: #15517

This tax is like hiring people to pump out your flooded basement while never fixing the broken pipe. I'm all for the tax if it is used to fix the real problems.

Report Violation
Posted by lobo at 10/18/09 01:02PM        Post ID#: #15523

Where is the local Republican party, FYI and tea party crowd? I'd like to hear what they think about this $50Million tax.

Nobody is going to lose their job. This tax expires in 14.5 months. There is plenty of time for a leader to emerge and propose a solution that addresses public safety. Was the failure of the Yakima Police utility tax devastating?

Yakima Sheriffs aside, do you know anyone else in Yakima County (government or private sector) who has received a 20% or $8,000 raise in the last two years? Keep in mind the average local taxpayer makes about $15,000 per year.

Report Violation
Posted by fredo at 10/18/09 06:44PM        Post ID#: #15539

I think the YHR did a fantastic job on this issue. Im just as sick as everyone else regarding all the garbage that infest our communities. We need more patrol, prosecutors, more equipment and just more HELP!! $45k Yearly salary per officer to keep our streets safe? I think they're being under paid!!
Our highest paid goverment employees should be police officers who risk their lives for us! This Nov it's put up or shut up! Don't point fingers or complain about crime if you vote this tax down! I hate taxes just as much as anyone else but so far no one has proposed a better plan.

Report Violation
Posted by BacktoReality at 10/18/09 08:34PM        Post ID#: #15550

I will vote a big "YES".

Report Violation
Posted by yakleo at 10/18/09 08:36PM        Post ID#: #15551

I think I know where the missing money has gone. How about to the city manager, that has given himself a raise ever year, despite freezing wages for others. The City Council has done the same thing a time or two over the years as well. I can tell you first hand that YPD conserves every penny received. Shifts have been adjusted to maximize proficiency fighting crime, prosecuting, crime prevention and Jail housing. It would be amazing to see how the city could be ran with the funds available if politics were not in the mix. The philosophy of "you scratch my back" replaced with with "doing what is right for the people" regardless of political views is what would benefit Yakima the most. Regardless, there should be 100% accountability of monies spent by the city/county government to the tax payers. Everyone should be held to a standard of accountability; including tax payers to educate themselves.

Report Violation
Posted by lobo at 10/18/09 09:14PM        Post ID#: #15554

We can put 10,000 more police on the street to risk their lives and it won't make a difference if they arrest the same shooter and same car thief over and over and over and over just to give them a ride home.

This tax is a $50 Million game of catch & release in a relatively small, rural and poor county. Why would anyone vote to renew it? Make the Sheriff and police propose a plan that will actually reduce crime and put a stop to the flying bullets on our streets.

The Sheriff previously promised the money would be used for law enforcement, to hire more deputies and to make a difference or he himself Ken Irwin would not support it's renewal. Our RINO* Sheriff lied, lied, lied, and lied.

RINO = Republican In Name Only

Report Violation
Posted by bornandraised at 10/18/09 11:07PM        Post ID#: #15559


Lobo wrote-"won't make a difference if they arrest the same shooter and same car thief over and over and over"

"Make the Sheriff and police propose a plan that will actually reduce crime and put a stop to the flying bullets on our streets"

Lobo, if I am reading your post accurately you are saying it is the police and sheriff departments fault that there is a high re-offending rate of criminals with short jail times. If that is the case I am left scratching my head because that makes no sense to me. In your post you admit the police arrest the bad guy and then he is magically out on the streets again. What happens after he is arrested is the bad guy is turned over tot he court system and they are responsible for the amount of time the bad guy is incarcerated, law enforcement has nothing to do with it. And if you are in agreement with that then your post regarding law enforcement making a plan is irrelevant because law enforcement has nothing to do with the court systems actions and guidelines.

Maybe I am reading your post all wrong, feel free to clarify.

Report Violation
Posted by Foolmeonce at 10/19/09 07:58AM        Post ID#: #15572

To the both of you----the cops nor the courts can do no more than the laws allow and where do the laws and guidelines that they are sworn to uphold come from----they come from your elected state and/or federal representatives/senators/governor
and then they have to fight the ACLU along with a portion of the society that will not allow proper deterrents to some things.
And we the people don't want to pay for it anyway.
What does it cost to catch and keep???We don't have enough jails now.
So just where does this leave us---extermninate instead of rehabilitate or just what the hell do you people want???

Report Violation
Posted by Datruef at 10/19/09 09:44AM        Post ID#: #15577

I will vote for this tax. But, cities like Sunnyside who have also received this funding have laid off four policemen in the last four years. Then they take that police monies and use it else where. Thus all many of these cities like Sunnyside are doing is shuffling law funds to other areas. The reason is that they know they have this tax monies coming in. Then the city finds they had plenty of money to keep these officers ! I am very cautious in voting this in for that very reason. This money is used correctly because it has to be. But the other monies are shuffled. I would like to see this law repelled or not passed and then a 2 cent tax voted on for the sheriff's department. Then have each individual city vote in their own funding. Then we voters can control our city council's per their shuffling of the money!

Report Violation
Posted by Yakraised at 10/19/09 10:01AM        Post ID#: #15580

To all:
The money cannot be suffled to anything other than law enforcement, it is in the law itself. Per the layoffs that have happened, the unions have strongarmed the departments to large pay increases because of the increase in tax revenue, it is not the lack of fund management. All of the spending is available to the public so go ask for it instead of speculating. The sheriff has invested his lifes work into the protection of the citizens of our county and formerly Las Vegas, he is not here to protect his (R) status as they didnt even back him in his initial bid for the sheriff position, yet he still won. People boasting the "RINO" label care little about anything but the (R). So again to all, get your facts straight before you blow "facts" out of your backside.

Report Violation
Posted by honestly at 10/19/09 12:37PM        Post ID#: #15590

I will vote YES for this. I find it amazing that people keep saying that the police and courts need to do more. The police continue to arrest those who break the law. The courts do exactly what they are designed for, and "try" the cases. We as society create and modify laws with a focus on protecting our freedom and our rights. Many of these laws are designed to make the police and court jobs more difficult. So what is the priority, do you want your rights OR your money? If you think 1-2 deputies per shift for the entire lower Yakima Valley is sufficient you have made your choice. Goverment must make an attempt to keep everyone happy. At home we budget based on our priorities. Goverment works the same. Our representatives set the priorities based on what we tell them. Do you want nice roads, food and shelter for the poor, parks, your kids to be safe walking to school. Speak up. You cant have it all.

Report Violation
Posted by huh at 10/19/09 12:42PM        Post ID#: #15592

But I can underfund my police department because I know there are funds coming in that are specifically marked for this purpose and then fund the sidewalk building fund which I otherwise could not fund. The bottom line then is that I have used the funds for something other than law and order. I won't vote the measure either until this loop hole is closed and some accountability is provided.

Report Violation
Posted by Yakraised at 10/19/09 01:13PM        Post ID#: #15595

To "huh"

Again, read the bill. What you are talking about is against this law. Anything that has been shuffled around has been caught and returned to the law enforcement budget.

Report Violation
Posted by huh at 10/19/09 01:36PM        Post ID#: #15599

Please read carefully. It says nothing of how an entity will fund anything. It only says that the fund will be used for law enforcement. Now, I will fund my street repair for 1 million instead of 750 thousand knowing that the 250 thousand will be funded by the added tax. They call this a shell game and there is nothing that says it can't be done, only that they promise not to do it. Keep in mind that we got a promise not to raise taxes, before we raised taxes on companies that raised prices and effectively raised our taxes.

What will fix this is run a budget without the added tax and then if the tax is approved, add it to the law enforcement funds already approved. No approved budget? No tax fund provided.

Report Violation
Posted by topp1993 at 10/19/09 03:19PM        Post ID#: #15606

Toppenish cop checking for warrants on a sleeping guy outside the store huh? Yup, i feel like my money is getting put to good use. Where's the tribe in all this?

Report Violation
Posted by lobo at 10/19/09 08:26PM        Post ID#: #15622

There are books full of laws covering homicide, auto theft, burglary, vandalism, assault, shooting at homes from moving cars,etc... We don't need anymore laws.

Since this $50 Million failed tax passed the first time the county has FIVE FEWER deputies. Many of the cities diverted funds from their police department resulting in a zero or negative gain in officers. The Sheriff promised this money would fun more officers not fewer. He also said he would not support it this time if things didn't go as promised. Ken Irwin is a liar and YHR props him up.

Since this $50 Million fraud was pulled over us, the juvenile detention center closed most of its pods, so now its running at 25% capacity. The police, prosecutors and courts are not doing their job. I've personally experience their stonewalling. How many officers can be hired for Harold Delia's $120,000 salary?

Report Violation
Posted by bornandraised at 10/19/09 10:25PM        Post ID#: #15634

Lobo-"The police, prosecutors and courts are not doing their job"

Who are you to judge their work performances and make such broad unsubstantiated claims? You are making such claims by judging an extremely small example of their work, probably not even 1% of what they do in a month.

I will be voting yes on this for sure, and yes I think there could/should be some reform and changes made to the system, but I refrain from making myself look like a fool preaching exaggerated pro's or con's.

Report Violation
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?