RSSGovernor blasted over anti-smoking program cuts
Yakima Herald-Republic
E-mail
Print
Comments
More 'Local'
- Cell-phone-while-driving habit -- kick it or ticket
- Slice of Yakima: Lions Club member keeps the wheels rolling for children
- Added job means more pay
- Lawyers prepare to sit on the bench
- A great place to live? Yakima?
- Tea Party looks to get active politically
- Yakima forum will lay out ways to fight gangs
YAKIMA, Wash. -- A leading researcher of secondhand smoke sharply criticized the governor and the Legislature on Wednesday for cutting tobacco-control programs nearly in half, saying the cost to the health-care system will quickly overcome any short-term savings.
"Gov. Gregoire is no longer the anti-tobacco governor," Stanton Glantz, professor of
cardiology at the University of California, San Francisco, told a group of public health professionals meeting at the Yakima Convention Center.
"The fact that she let the program be gutted means she's just riding on the old coattails."
Gov. Chris Gregoire made her name as state attorney general in 1998 by leading the states in negotiating a master settlement with tobacco companies that poured billions into state coffers nationwide.
That settlement still brings in about $120 million a year to Washington state, with most going to pay for state-subsidized health care.
But the 2009 Legislature cut 43 percent from the state's $28.5 million-a-year tobacco-control program, which pays for the Quitline telephone help line and media campaigns targeting young people. The "NoStankYou" ads, showing the ugly side of smoking, aren't running any longer this year.
Glenn Kuper, a spokesman for Gregoire, responded that many successful programs like tobacco prevention were affected in order to address the state's approximately $9 billion shortfall.
He also said that Gregoire's efforts have "instilled a culture of tobacco prevention" in the state. "We have tougher indoor smoking laws, adult smoking rates are down more than 30 percent, and youth smoking overall has dropped by about half," Kuper said in an e-mail response.
Quitline is still active, but the amount of time it provides free nicotine gum was cut from eight to four weeks. The gum is also only available now to low-income clients.
The Legislature also approved diverting 6 cents of the $2 per pack cigarette tax from tobacco programs into the general fund, which means the tobacco account will be down to zero at the end of this two-year budget cycle in July of 2011.
"They raided our program," said Terry Reid, manager of the tobacco control program, which is housed in the Department of Health. Reid introduced Glantz at the conference, calling him the man most likely to appear in the nightmares of tobacco industry lawyers and executives.
Glantz has spent most of his career fighting big tobacco as both a researcher and activist, prodding politicians and public-health organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Surgeon General.
His research has focused on the effects of second-hand smoke on cardiovascular health. Glantz said someone who has been chronically exposed to second-hand smoke has a 30 percent increase in the risk of heart disease. That's higher than the 20 percent risk of lung cancer associated with second-hand smoke.
Glantz explained that second-hand smoke, also known as passive smoking, activates platelets in the blood that form clots. When those clots are activated inappropriately in a coronary artery, the result can be a heart attack. If they clot in the brain, it's a stroke.
He encouraged the public health professionals to exercise their First Amendment rights and lobby politicians to restore funding to tobacco-control programs.
"Tell them, 'It's your fault people are dropping dead.'"
Leah Beth Ward can be reached at 577-7626 or lward@yakimaherald.com
In the meantime, I see many neighbors who are n welfare, buying Cigarettes, and also beer, with money that should be used for necessities that are for survival, not pleasure, anyway. It has never stopped.
So what's the big deal? Welfare is a bust the way it runs, and always has been. Too many benefits for too long, without requiring the recipients to participate in some way, such as working off their stipends. Some will say they are mostly disabled, but still, there are some menial tasks that can be done by most disabled people and it would also give them back some pride and maybe even get them off of welfare after a time.
Vote Obama! The government will take care of everbody and everything! OOPS, He is president, what happened to the "CHANGE"?
Report ViolationFrom anti-smoking to welfare...smooth transition. You seem to forget the overhaul during the early Clinton years. Not to say, it is a perfect program-don't think those exist.
The headline was the usual sensationalized drivel media uses to get you to read. It could have easily gone the other way "Critics praise new usage of tobacco funds." Baaaaa.
You don't need a Govt program to stop individuals from smoking, drinking, etc.... its called "Self-responsibility" try it. Sorry that we have very weak people who are so dependent on Govt that they need to be told when to wake up, sleep, what to eat, what to drive, etc.... Good move by the Gov, time to cut deeper into other needless programs.
Report ViolationHow about some personal responsibility for once? Unless you have been living in a box on mars EVERYONE knows that smoking is harmful and yet they still make the poor choice to begin or continue the habit. More tax payer $$ thrown at this is not going to stop it's use so for once I actually agree with our twit of a Gov. Although, the cuts should have began at the top....with her salary and pension first.
Report Violationi'm with farmerjar. We should educate the youth but grown folks should know better.
Report ViolationWorthless programs like this one should never have existed in the first place. Good start.
Report ViolationOddThomasFan
The Cinton plan limited welfare to two years, except for Washington State which was given five years, don't know why. There aren't all lot of people on welfare now except for illegal mothers. Because you cannot force an illegal to work because you would then be forcing them to get fake ID illegal woman can never be taken off welfare. And the father can live in their home and it's ok, even if he's working. And it's not just poor families on the eastside, it can be well to do families, they look like whole families, maybe have a nice home and car on the west side, maybe right next door to you.
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?
