In wake of red-ink forecast, silence on tax increases is good


Yakima Herald-Republic

 

The following editorials appear in the Sept. 22, 2009, Yakima Herald-Republic.

Lawmakers will face a troublesome task when they reconvene in January. But it's something they knew was bound to happen -- further budget cuts.

That's certainly what it looks like following the latest revenue figures from the state's chief economist. Last week, Arun Raha reported further weakening in consumer spending that will translate into $238 million less for the state's coffers, and more red ink during the next two years.

While the recession has bottomed out, as many economists across the nation concur, the prospect for a quick recovery is not in the offing. Slow and not-so-steady are the watchwords for a bounce back in the tax revenues that fuel the state's budget. There is one good sign: an upswing in foreign trade. Whenever that occurs, Washington tends to benefit.

Most encouraging in the wake of these new revenue forecasts is the nearly unanimous call from lawmakers to reduce spending. No one has yet expressed interest in suggesting a tax increase, nor is there a clamor for a special session.

These are both good signs. This is certainly not the time to entertain any type of tax increase nor is the revenue projection a cause for panic.

In the interim, we anxiously await the return of consumer confidence. A strong Christmas sales season would be a boost, not only in the belief that the worst is behind us, but also in added tax revenues. That would make the lawmakers' task ahead a bit easier to handle.

 

It's time to terminate Legislature's exemption on public records

Nestled in the state's public records act is an exemption that keeps all e-mails of the Legislature secret.

We know all too well that this exemption does not extend to locally elected officials. A recent uproar over e-mails exchanged among Yakima City Council members who were trying to line up votes for a new budget policy testifies to that.

But in Olympia, legislative correspondence, including e-mails, are exempt from public scrutiny. That's why during the last legislative session, where millions of dollars had to be lopped off the state's future two-year budget, scant information was released by lawmakers detailing what type of options they were considering. They didn't have to. The only documents they had to make public were official actions of the Senate and the House.

Hopefully that will change, and we have the Sunshine Committee to thank for that. In 2007, the Legislature set up the this committee, made up primarily of lawmakers and news media representatives, to review more than 300 exemptions contained in the Public Records Act.

Meeting last month, the committee passed a recommendation asking lawmakers to repeal the exemption of personal records of the Legislature. That would open up for public review legislative e-mails and correspondence -- just as the state's Public Records Act requires of all other legislative bodies in Washington.

It's high time the Legislature dealt with this egregious exemption. Lawmakers often claim they are exceptional arbiters for the public good. But that doesn't translate into an exception in the Open Records Act. If they have nothing to hide, then prove it.

 

* Members of the Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board are Michael Shepard, Bob Crider, Spencer Hatton and Karen Troianello.

 



Commentsicon2
Posted by Nick at 09/22/09 06:49AM        Post ID#: #13494

I think that the loud warnings from grassroots outrage may be at least, some of the reason the legislators are avoiding proposals for tax increases. Since the disclosure of the budget disaster, (predicted by Rossi) every time there as been even a MENTION of a tax increase - we explicitly told them "NO!" Perhaps the local tea parties and demonstrations against government spending are having some effect after all on BOTH sides of the aisle.

Report Violation
Posted by Nick at 09/22/09 06:58AM        Post ID#: #13497

"OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) -- Workers' compensation rates would climb by an average of 7.6 percent next year, under changes proposed by state labor officials."

However, there are more ways than one to cover budget crunches. The above quotation from a related article demonstrates an example of how the State can raise funds to offset tax losses.

Rob Peter to pay Paul, same difference. The trouble is, we are Peter, they are Paul. We should look for more of this type of bend the scenes actions by the bureaucrats instead of the legislators.

Report Violation
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?