Activist spreads a warning about R-71

Leah Ward
Yakima Herald-Republic

YAKIMA -- The campaign manager for opposition to Referendum-71 was in Yakima Friday for what he said is the "nuts and bolts" phase of the campaign to overturn a law passed this spring granting a wide array of benefits to same-sex couples.

Larry Stickney, of Protect Marriage Washington, said the organization is busy distributing 100,000 pieces of literature and yard signs urging voters to reject R-71 as an assault on the institution of marriage.

"Our contention is the majority of Washingtonians are not comfortable with this," Stickney said in an interview.

R-71 asks voters to approve or reject a law that extends marriage-like benefits to gay and lesbian couples as well as some heterosexual seniors registered as domestic partners under state law.

Stickney said the law is a "Trojan horse" for the legalization of marriage between gays and lesbians. He said it will lead to the disintegration of the family, inhibit pastors from preaching against homosexuality and result in a Scandinavian-style society with "negative outcomes for children who lack both a mother and a father in their homes."

Stickney, 51, of Arlington, is the president of Washington Values Alliance, which he founded last year after serving as the executive director of the conservative Family Policy Institute of Washington.

Stickney, who earlier taped a show for Christian Broadcasting of Yakima, said his group is not motivated by hate or hostility toward gays and lesbians.

Josh Friedes, campaign manager for Washington Families Standing Together, a coalition of organizations that support the domestic partnership law, said the conversation should be about protecting basic rights of families. The law, for example, allows the gay or lesbian partner of a police officer killed in the line of duty to receive death benefits. The law also protects heterosexual seniors who can lose their nest eggs when they marry after being widowed.

"I'll leave it to the people to decide whether it's hateful to take away basic protections from Washingtonians," Friedes said.

R-71 was certified for the November ballot earlier this month after a Thurston County judge dismissed the arguments of gay-rights supporters that petitions carrying tens of thousands of signatures were improperly signed. There is an ongoing court battle over whether those who signed petitions to get the measure on the ballot can be publicly disclosed.

Earlier this week, five companies came out for approving R-71. The Boeing Co., Microsoft Corp., Nike, Puget Sound Energy, RealNetworks and Vulcan Inc. said in a statement that, "Overturning this law would undo years of equal rights progress made in Washington state. We do not believe that this step backward would be in the best interest for the future of our state."

Stickney said the companies are pressured by "the power of money, the governor and the media" to support domestic partnerships. He also said they fear being boycotted by gay-rights groups.

"The Puget Sound area is a formidable force," he said.

 

* Leah Beth Ward can be reached at 509-577-7626 or lward@yakimaherald.com .



Commentsicon2
Posted by Nick at 09/19/09 06:12AM        Post ID#: #13241

I have no problem with "Strategic Alliances" of couples that allow them to receive the same legal considerations as in an otherwise traditional "marriage".

I see no reason whatsoever, that the resulting alliance needs to be called "Marriage". Save that for those who want to continue the religious tradition of being married in the church.

What is the big deal? The big deal is: If such alliances were allowed, Businesses, the State and federal government, (Which has cowardly left this question to the individual states) will potentially lose large amounts of money they would otherwise get from taxes and regulations and have to pay out, or not collect taxes on, domestic partner benefits. It would benefit seniors by not messing up their individual and separate Social Security stipends that they worked all their lives to pay into and should receive. That system, by the way, wouldn't be facing financial ruin if our dear Federal Government, (Congress) hadn't ILLEGALLY ROBBED IT OF ITS FUNDS on many occasions.

Add to this, the lost business benefits in several ways, that individuals suffer by not being married. I frankly don't care if gay partnerships should also benefit by the "alliance" type of system. Everyone should be able to claim "equal application under the law".

An election should not even be necessary, but is, thanks to the ever-present lawyers and courts, and the ACLU.

Report Violation
Posted by ogre at 09/19/09 08:10AM        Post ID#: #13252

If they want to be miserable like everybody else. I just wondered whats so special about marriage? Its not the 50's, and since half of all marriages end in divorce, I can't see why people have such a hard time letting gay couples marry.

Report Violation
Posted by RosaGarza at 09/19/09 08:17AM        Post ID#: #13253

You know those firemen and those cops earned that pension. They --earned-- it. Not letting them pass it on to someone after dying is --stealing-- from them. And dont even get me started about stealing from old people too by taking away their partnership. This whole thing makes me so mad. I'm voting for keeping the law because I --will not-- steal from hard working people o nuestros abuelos.

Report Violation
Posted by sjuan at 09/19/09 08:56AM        Post ID#: #13256

(This comment has been removed by a Yakima Herald-Republic moderator)

Posted by overfifty at 09/19/09 03:00PM        Post ID#: #13272

Ogre writes...
"I just wondered whats so special about marriage?"

I don't know what to tell you Ogre, but don't knock it till you've tried it. I've been married to the same man for 30 years and all I can say is I've got one of the best men walking this earth! I'd do it all over in a heartbeat! As far as your comment about "everyone being miserable".....not true. There have been many miserable hard times over the years, but nothing so bad we couldn't work it out together. There is someone out there just waiting for you...you just have to want it and then work at it when you find that person. Try it....you might be pleasantly surprised!

Report Violation
Posted by KirkGroenig at 09/19/09 10:17PM        Post ID#: #13294

Marriage is for a man and woman only.
Anthing else is disgusting and morally wrong.
Wake up America!
Stop the continued moral decline.
Pastors where are you on this?
Preaching in churches against this issue should be loud and clear- Not Acceptable!

Report Violation
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?