Civil injunctions another tool in fight against gangs
Yakima Herald-Republic Editorial Board
More 'Opinion'
- Wine tourism doesn't stop at the winery
- Duck muck: Oregon football officials sending mixed messages
- Keep eye on business while March Madness prevails
- Overdose immunity bill could cost lives
- Special session? Hasn't Legislature done enough damage?
- State employee raises are on taxpayers' dime
- Court can send clear message on public access to public records
This editorial appears in the Yakima Herald-Republic on Aug. 23, 2009.
Last week's seizure in Yakima by law enforcement authorities of an extensive weapons cache only adds to the sense of fear and loathing gang violence has created this summer.
Here's just a glimpse of what was taken during the drug-related arrest: a MAC-11 machine-gun pistol, several AK-47s, homemade silencers, shortened AR-15 rifles and shotguns. The total: 33 guns. Don't forget the three pipe bombs and a bag full of rolled-up $100 bills totaling thousands of dollars.
Police believe the weapons, and certainly the homemade silencers, could be part of a weapons trade involving gang members -- though those suspected of having the firearms are not part of a gang.
While this weapons seizure is clearly the most sensational of those recently carried out by law enforcement, they underscore this summer's wave of gang violence that, since May, has left at least 19 people wounded in Yakima. Several have been innocent bystanders.
It turns out state Attorney General Rob McKenna was visiting Yakima at the same time police were conducting that weapons seizure. When McKenna spoke at the Greater Yakima Chamber of Commerce luncheon, he reminded those in the audience that gang violence is not restricted to Yakima. It's a statewide menace, he pointed out.
In the city of Yakima, officials believe there are at least 500 gang members. Countywide, the numbers rise to 2,000. Nationwide, a district attorney's association claims there are 30,000 gangs with 800,000 members.
Yes, it's a big problem and McKenna came armed with a new way for this state to deal with it: civil injunctions.
An injunction is a court order that seeks to stop individuals or organizations from preventing the general public from enjoying life and property. Popularized in California, an anti-gang civil injunction goes one step further and is directed at criminal street gangs. These gangs can be targeted because they are an identifiable group due to their colors and other signs. The injunction enables police to detain gang members and stop them from associating in a defined area like a neighborhood.
Let's say a homeowner feels threatened by the presence of a nearby gang whose members gather at a street corner near the home. An injunction could be used to clear them out so the homeowner could once again enjoy sitting on his or her porch or front stoop.
It's an intriguing tool to fight potential gang violence. Of course, these injunctions must be directed at gang members whose activities are ongoing and are occurring within a defined location. Members of the gang must also be served first with the injunction before it can be enforced. That may prove to be a tough proposition.
But McKenna vows to push ahead with civil injunctions and prepare a measure for state lawmakers to consider when they reconvene in January. Here, the county prosecutor has already been looking into these California-style injunctions.
While a civil injunction may not have the firepower of those weapons seized several weeks ago, it can provide a different kind of ammunition -- the ability to detain known gang members and get them off the streets.
It's not a cure-all, but it's certainly another means of dampening gang activity and the violence that it spawns. If it leads to reclaiming just one neighborhood, it's worth the effort.
* Members of the Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board are Michael Shepard, Bob Crider, Spencer Hatton and Karen Troianello.
The weapons bust had nothing to do with gang activity.
Report ViolationInteresting idea. I am wondering what the structure of penalties are for violations. You can pretty much kiss any monetary fines away, those don't work because you can't take nothing from nothing not to mention it would be just inhumane (shudder) to take State assistance away so they can pay for their iPhones and cable. If it gets to the point of jail it isn't a big deal for a week or 2 for them so I question the real "teeth" this would have on them.
Report Violationcountryvet: I read that 40 guns were from a Gang Unit and ATF case where they indicted 12 gang members for selling guns including a .50 cal. sniper rifle and the other 30 were from a drug raid that found the pipebombs and sileners. Those were not from a gang member.
YAKIMA, Wash.- Yakima Police officers collect more than 70 guns. Officers say they were taken during gang and narcotic stings. To show how well gang patrols are working, officers laid out all the weapons they've picked up.
Some were recovered just last week in Yakima,mostly gang related.
Others were related to narcotics and taken in a sting that's been going on for months. From gang and drug busts, police took more than 70 weapons off the streets.
"The results are great to only encourage us to continue with out strategies short and long term to fight gang violence," said Councilwoman Sonia Rodriguez.
Another question I have is how would a civil injunction work against a minor? Lets face it, a significant % of bangers are under the age of 18, is it applicable to them as well?
Report ViolationB&R, that is an excellent question. Why can't known gang members be tried as adults? Poor, deprived kids, give em a break....b*llsh*t. Give em back a little of what they have been dishing out!
Report ViolationAgreed! The "juvenile system laws" of this country need rewriting since it's a proven notion (hate to say 'fact' because the liberal juvenile gang banger 'they're just children' faction will make the call of 'prove it') that children grow up so much quicker in this day and age. Any juvenile involved in gang activity knows what he/she is getting into well ahead of time. So, they want to act like an adult and flush their juvenile years down the drain? Treat gang members as adults in all cases.
Report ViolationI'm trying to figure out if countryvet forgot the ? at the end of his question or was trying for sarcasm.
ConchRepublic, I was with you until you tried laying the source of the problem off on liberals and one might then assume Democrats, when you live in a community where neither has survived in any appreciable numbers for decades. Definitely none have held any position of authority or power. Yakima City and County as well as most of the surrounding counties have been dominated by Republicans and Conservatives at all levels. We finally wrestled the title of Conservative Armpit of the State away from Spokane in the 70s. He%$, if your just being silly, you might as well blame it on bears, there aren’t any of them either.
So if we start from there and add that for at least 25 years Yakima has been the hub for northwest drug trafficking, had the worst gang violence activity in the state (often sited nationally), is virtually over run by illegal aliens, is one of the five lowest income locations in the nation, do we then logically assume that these are Republican/Conservative problems or signs of ineffective Republican/Conservative leadership?
Or, is it possible the problems are bigger than that and that the name calling does nothing more than make you feel good and p&$# off someone else that might be willing to help. But, hey I've been wrong before.
Just Bob-"ConchRepublic, I was with you until you tried laying the source of the problem off on liberals and one might then assume Democrats, when you live in a community where neither has survived in any appreciable numbers for decades."
Very true statement about not a significant amount of Dem's or Lib's in Yakima County, but.....
Understanding the legal system that deals with juveniles is not a city (municipal) or county (district) court issue; all juveniles are charged in a superior court (state level). I do see how as a State, Washington is lead by the west side which is predominantly democrat/liberal. I see that as where the Yakima Superior Court is getting it's rulings they are required to follow in dealing with the juveniles.
I am not trying to "blame" a political party for the juvenile problems, but I do feel the superior court judges/justices are responsible for the mess.
Funny in Yakima grafitti is a victims crime.
Report ViolationJust Bob - Heck... I'd NEVER blame the situation on bears or any other type of indigenous wildlife. THEY were here before any of us humans. We should all just leave and whoever is the last one out the door should remember to turn out the light.
Report ViolationBornandraised wrote: "Washington is lead by the west side which is predominantly democrat/liberal."
Much better said than I did and it explains the overall state of our justice system. The caboose (Yakima) can only follow the track that the engine pulls it down. BTW... I think you spelled "west" incorrectly. Shouldn't it be spelled L-E-F-T?
Gang activity is really something that too many city councils are worried about. If they were, the problem could be resolved. For example, the Sunnyside city council has laid off or not filled 8 police vacancies because they say there is a shortage of money. And yet they come up with $45,000.00 for the one plane airport. Then they give ALL department heads raises. And majority of them were making over $100,000.00 a year already. And this town of 2500 to 3500 registered voters cannot afford one $100,000.00 person. And only 25% of the voters turned out. Thus the residents don't care about gangs either! I do think we should just pay bounty hunters so much for each gang member they bring in and parachute them inside of Afghanistan!
Report ViolationOh brother, any reason to go on about those LIBERALS. Not every issue is about politics. Grow up already. Imagine that LIBERAL state of California coming up with the idea of civil injunctions. What is the world coming to?? Alot of pointing fingers out there but not many solutions. I like the idea of civil injunctions. Change has to start somewhere. BTW juveniles are included in this civil injunction in that LIBERAL state. *SARCASM*
Report ViolationOTF you are correct, not every issue is about politics. I hope that was not addressed towards me and my understanding/explanation of the superior court system because putting blame on a party of political belief was not my intent of my post. Although I think it does, to some degree, affect how our justice system is currently functioning and explains some of the rulings that occur.
As far as this including juveniles I would love to see the penalty/sentencing guidelines that apply to them to see what kind of weight this really has. Hopefully it isn't another "J-Walking" style penalty.
Civil injunctions have a provision that allows the confiscation of personal property, or any that is used by the person who has the injunction against him/her. ie. If a ganger is caught in violation of the injunction while using the parents house for his violations, then the house can be seized. Also, his car, or anything else.
The weapons seizure may well have been from people who are here representing the cartels as they recruit for drug retail outlets - the gangs, who are commonly the end point of distribution.
YHR- you are welcome. Read post 10649 by yours truly.
http://www.yakima-herald.com/discussions/12409
mis type, disregard my previous post
Report Violation
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?

RSS
E-mail
Print
Comments