RSSYakima ethics code proposals: limit to council, screen claims
Yakima Herald-Republic
E-mail
Print
Comments
More 'Local'
- New concept and new look planned for State Fair Park
- Volunteer judges offer to ease backlog of civil court cases
- Hitchhiker? DNA leads to husband
- Home custody escapee back in jail
- Mabton mayor pushes to hire Selah ex-police chief
- Account to benefit Dale Carpenter
- Sunnyside hires firm to find new manager
A proposed Yakima City Council ethics code would be limited to members of the council and complaints would be screened in closed-door executive sessions, a council subcommittee decided Monday.
Wary of creating burdensome regulations and duplicating state law, the council's Rules and Procedures Committee began hashing out an ethics code that was first proposed by Councilwoman Sonia Rodriguez earlier this summer.
Council members asked assistant city attorney Jim Mitchell to begin drafting guidelines similar to the ethics code used by the U.S. House of Representatives. The committee -- composed of Rodriguez, Micah Cawley and Bill Lover -- agreed that only members of the City Council, and not city employees, would be subject to the code.
Much of the discussion centered on the subject of "accountability," meaning who would investigate or adjudicate ethics complaints.
Several committee members, particularly Cawley, objected to the creation of a standing committee or panel. Cawley said he still feels the sting of an unsustained ethics complaint against him last year during the appointment process for an open seat on the council.
"If you're under investigation, you're a bad person in our society," he said, suggesting an ethics code should include "heavy handed" penalties for false or malicious complaints.
He expressed concern that an ethics code might prompt a flood of complaints, but Councilwoman Maureen Adkison, an alternate member of the committee, questioned that assumption.
Mitchell said he had researched the ethics code adopted by the city of Spokane and found that few complaints had been filed.
The Rules Committee agreed that the full council may want to screen complaints in executive session. Such sessions are secret in nature and allow elected officials to meet behind closed doors.
In an interview after the meeting, Allied Daily Newspapers of Washington Executive Director Rowland Thompson questioned the legality of screening ethics complaints in executive session.
Thompson, whose organization represents the state's daily newspapers, said he was unsure what members of the City Council's Rules Committee hoped such a process would achieve. By state law, elected officials must state why they are going into executive session and are prohibited from taking action in such meetings.
"They're trapped essentially," he said. "All they can do is take advice. ... They just have to sit there. They can ask some questions I suppose ... but they can't provide direction."
* Chris Bristol can be reached at 509-577-7748 or at cbristol@yakimaherald.com.
There WILL be leaks even if everything is investigated outside the realm of the public.
Report ViolationSo - I'm not sure what would be accomplished if the executive session requires that the agenda be made public and the council members cannot make recommendations or provide guidance. I am in favor of having any ethics complaint discussed in an open forum and, if proven to be without merit and maliciously motivated, the leveler of the complaint should be punished. Frivilous complaints and lawsuits are a scourge and should be squashed and exposed publicly, just as proven unethical behavior should be. It is also my belief that this would not discourage complaints with merit - only those based on other motivations.
Report ViolationAt least some do-do heads may get an education of what an ethic is and then maybe they can let others know, duh. When it comes to something like this, after all the cr_p that comes down in Yakima, like ending up with the Chief nobody else, wants how can anybody really complain about a little extra regulations?
Report Violation
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?
