House jet request flies in face of recession realities


Yakima Herald-Republic

 

This editorial appears in the Yakima Herald-Republic on Aug. 12, 2009.

Surely House leadership didn't think the prospect of buying an additional four new corporate jets would fly with the American public?

But they did.

House leaders backed down only after news reports last week, most prominently from the Wall Street Journal, revealed the full details of this purchase.

It appeared so routine. Before heading out on summer recess, lawmakers voted to add four more aircraft to an earlier request for four other new planes by the Air Force and Defense Department. The planes were to be added to a fleet of about 24 aircraft that the Air Force maintains for use by lawmakers, administration officials and military brass for trips in the U.S. and abroad.

The four planes that the House wanted the Pentagon to buy were two 737s and two Gulfstream V planes. The 737s cost $70 million each while the Gulfstream version is priced at $66 million.

The full $550 million appropriation for all eight planes still needed to be approved by the Senate. That won't be necessary now after Rep. John Murtha, D-Pennsylvania, declared Monday the four new aircraft -- and possibly all eight -- will be dropped from the Pentagon's spending bill.

Murtha still defended the appropriation, claiming the newer aircraft would be cheaper to maintain and operate than the older versions.

Well, bully for you, John. How about flying coach for a change?

Congress can pencil out all of the future savings it wants to. That still doesn't excuse the appearance of irresponsibility that these proposed purchases sends to the American public suffering through one of this nation's worst recessions in history.

Did Murtha and the House leadership glance at the jobless report released last Friday? Perhaps they looked only at the official unemployment rate, which actually fell from 9.5 percent to 9.4 percent for July. That's because only 247,000 jobs were lost. While that is the smallest monthly figure since last summer, what comfort can lawmakers find in knowing there are another quarter-million Americans who have lost their jobs?

So far 6.7 million jobs have been lost since the recession started in December 2007. Of that figure, 5 million workers have been unemployed for more than six months. That's the highest figure since records have been kept.

And against this backdrop of joblessness, a majority in the House thought it was fiscally prudent to buy, not one, but four new jets for themselves. Try to tell that to a single mom who just got laid off and is struggling to put food on the table for her family. Try to convince her that a $66 million corporate jet is what this country needs at this time.

These are the same lawmakers who blistered automobile executives earlier in the year for flying their corporate jets -- instead of driving company cars or taking commercial flights -- to hearings where they were pleading for taxpayer bailout funds. How is a General Motors' corporate jet any different than a shiny new Gulfstream V for Congress? More cupholders?

Symbols are important. Failing to recognize their significance smacks of arrogance. In this recession, that's something we can do without.

 

* Members of the Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board are Michael Shepard, Bob Crider, Spencer Hatton and Karen Troianello.



Commentsicon2
Posted by Nick at 08/12/09 06:32AM        Post ID#: #9462

Typical of the double standards so prevalent in this Congress and our government in general. These politicians are simply out of touch with the rest of us - and THAT is not a good thing. Just look at the demands of Queen Pelosi in her disregard of our taxpayer dollars as she commandeers a government plane for her boondoggles around the world and trips home, as an example.

Why?, Because they don't have to live as we live, nor would they choose to do so, so how can they possibly comprehend the realities we face in order to help fix the problems?

And WE are stupid enough to keep them in the style to which they have become accustomed. The demonstrations of the poorest of examples to set as leaders, if you ask me.

Report Violation
Posted by countryvet at 08/12/09 03:17PM        Post ID#: #9531

"The American republic will endure until the day congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money."




Alexis De tocqueville

Report Violation
Posted by Starman at 08/12/09 03:48PM        Post ID#: #9540

Term limits and no lobbyists would take care of most of Congresses problems.

Report Violation
Posted by YakRob at 08/12/09 04:05PM        Post ID#: #9544

These people really have no common sense - isn't it obvious that purchases of luxury items on the tax payer dime is totally out of the question right now, and questionable most any other time? It's not like supporting the Arts, afterall.

Report Violation
Posted by Grif at 08/13/09 02:06PM        Post ID#: #9702

Great comments. Only things I can add to the Auto/Jet comments are

Inflated Sense of Self Entitlement

(a bit of sarcasm) We just need to realize these people are very, very important.

Well, that's the way they've always been treated, by their peers, and by us. Very hard not to believe how great they are, and how they should be treated. How else would they view themselves?

And a belief I have (and really need to keep this belief, but it's getting slippery and hard to hold).

The vast majority of new members of the House and Congress, both State and Federal, go there intending to serve the public and do the "right thing". Even if I have some disagreements with "right thing". I'll give them credit for trying.

That does not mean I think they're (majority of them), are still trying to to the "right thing" after being reelected a time or two. (needs another page of comments here)

Not so sure I have a good answer for that one. Vote no? Term limits? Vote against the incumbents? Very valid arguments against all of these. Who was it from Spokane a few years ago that got voted out, and his response was "What am I supposed to do now?" or something like that.

Report Violation
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?