RSSFood safety: More regulation good, as long as it doesn't go too far
Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board
E-mail
Print
Comments
More 'Opinion'
- Ruling underscores school districts' need for levies
- State must assure safety of its most vulnerable citizens
- Enforcement is key to any panhandling decision
- Bid to unionize child-care centers still a bad idea
- Confidential bank oversight won't return confidence
- Here's a chance to make a difference for heart attack victims
- CWU's plea for stable state funding is sensible (and unlikely)
This editorial appears in the Aug. 5, 2009, Yakima Herald-Republic
Legislation to improve food-safety rules has cleared the House and is on its way to the Senate. With recent high-profile incidents including the 2006 distribution of E. coli-contaminated spinach and the more recent salmonella traced to pistachios, giving the government greater powers in terms of food inspections and recall of tainted foods seems appropriate.
However, there are aspects of the legislation that require further scrutiny and need to be addressed when the Senate takes up the measure this fall.
First, here's what the Food Safety Enhancement Act offers in hopes of restoring confidence in our nation's food supply:
Under the new legislation, the FDA would gain greater authority to recall a product after consumers become sick or die. Currently, the federal agency can only coax a food-production facility to recall a product.
For facilities that are deemed high-risk in terms of food contamination, the FDA would be required to make inspections every six to 12 months. These types of plants include those with a history of food-safety problems or those that handle food products that spoil easily.
Lower-risk processing plants would be inspected at least once every three years. Right now, some facilities may go a decade or longer before undergoing a federal inspection.
The bill would require an annual fee of $500 from food-processing plants to pay for the added inspections, with a cap of $175,000 for companies with multiple plants. The fees, though, would cover only 40 percent of the cost for these added inspections.
Also required in the legislation would be new, elaborate safety programs developed by processing plants to solve food-safety problems before they occur and a new system to be created by the FDA to trace food products and ingredients.
New authority for the FDA is good news, not only for consumers but for food producers, too. We do not want to see another scare like the one that devastated the tomato industry last year when tomatoes were blamed for a salmonella outbreak that actually had been caused by tainted peppers.
What worries us about this legislation are the proposed, but not yet defined, regulations governing how produce is grown and harvested. These rules, which the FDA would formulate over the next three years, would focus on pathogens and how they enter the food supply.
However, since a majority of Yakima Valley's food products, namely tree fruits, are grown far off the ground, problems associated with ground-borne pathogens are not much of an issue. As for potatoes being grown in the region, most of the crop is processed, eliminating the possibility of food-borne illness.
Also, the legislation allows the FDA to make quarantines of wide geographic areas whenever a foodborne outbreak occurs. As witnessed by the tomato scare, mistakes are made and an unwarranted quarantine could have devastating effects upon growers and processors. The quarantine provision is necessary, but its expansive reach should be limited.
As for food-safety inspections, fruit packers in Central Washington already face numerous audits imposed by large retail chains both here and abroad. If the proposed federal inspection requirements would help reduce these audits by retail chains, that would be welcome. Currently, fruit packers face as many as five audits annually.
While the legislation passed by the House considerably strengthens the safety of our nation's food supply, the Senate still needs to modify the measure so its regulations don't overreach and cause more hassle than good.
* Members of the Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board are Michael Shepard, Bob Crider, Spencer Hatton and Karen Troianello.
(This comment has been removed by a Yakima Herald-Republic moderator)
Why is the government concerned so much about food safety at these plants and utterly unconcerned about illegal aliens working there? And why did the Orwellian thought police remove this comment?
Where is the personal attack?
Where is offensive remark?
Where is the personally identifiable information?
Moderator, if you have changed your rules or criteria for censorship would you please inform us of those changes so that we may comply.
I have worked in the food industries for 32 years, let me say we need more inspections, surprise inspections at that.
My husband had some food work as well and he told me horror stories.
I worked for a very large grocery chain.
When the health inspector is coming 1 store calls the other across town and warns them ...then everyone cleans up!(for the inspection)
Filth is every where, we were supposed to give out treats as a bribe to the health inspector and weights and measures person.
The majority of inspectors never looked under things, around things or bothered to really inspect.
I saw cockroaches running around and nobody cares.
People stealing meat and putting it in their pants, the mgr.( after getting the guy arrested) put the meat back in the case.
A man came in drunk..peed all over the bread aisle and they left the bread to be purchased.Yuk!
If you looked at the back rooms of the restaurants, bakeries, delis, etc you would be shocked.
We were to distract them as they came through.
Believe me, this goes on everywhere.I don't care who you are , the employees who care would keep things clean but you can't do it alone. There are many slobs who work in the food industries who only want a paycheck.
3 year inspection is wrong, every 6 months is more like it. If I could speak out to the legislation and change this I would. More and more people are going to get sick from these establishments if they don't do something fast.
Yes we do need the Government to step in.
Country, your topic is growing old. Not everything is about illegal immigration. We all can see right thru to your agenda already. Yawn.
Report Violation
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?
