Prosser pays $175,000 to settle public records lawsuit
Yakima Herald-Republic
More 'Local'
- CWU teacher education programs in good standing
- Third suspect arrested in fatal shooting of Las Vegas officer
- Red Cross urges sending holiday cards to service members
- Selah schools superintendent gets state honor
- Mexican growers' coalition donates apples to food bank
- Two pedestrians hit by vehicles in separate incidents
- Struggle in pickup with officer may draw assault charge
PROSSER, Wash. -- City Hall will pay one of its most persistent critics $175,000 to settle a lawsuit over public records.
The city will pay the money to Larry Loges, who sued in 2006 claiming that Prosser violated state public disclosure laws by improperly or incompletely responding to numerous public records requests.
Mayor Paul Warden said it would have cost $500,000 or more to go to a trial that could have dragged on for years with no clear winner.
"I just want to move forward," Warden said Wednesday.
A trial had been set to start Aug. 10 in Benton County Superior Court.
Prosser City Council members unanimously approved the settlement Tuesday night, Warden said.
Money for the settlement will come from reserve funds, said Charlie Bush, city administrator.
The settlement closes only one chapter in Loges' long-running battles with the Prosser municipal government over everything from public records to water bills to trailers.
City officials claim Loges, who owns two trailer parks at the north edge of town, has a history of trying to avoid permits for construction, putting up signs and moving trailers. In 2007, the city sued him for an unpermitted trailer. Loges finally tore it down, leaving only a toilet sitting on the property for several days.
For his part, Loges often has used his property as a soapbox for criticism of City Hall, spray-painting remarks on his trailers so passers-by could read them. He even displayed a blow-up doll meant to depict former Mayor Linda Lusk.
Loges has filed three claims -- each denied by the city -- relating to his trailers and an alleged civil rights violation during a traffic stop by city police, Bush said.
But Loges is most known at City Hall for his volumes of public records requests. He has filed 213 since 2006.
The settlement applies only to 22 disputed 2006 records and follows an earlier pretrial ruling by Benton County Superior Court Judge Cameron Mitchell that the city improperly handled 11 of 22 requests.
Both sides say the settlement amount falls short of the costs related to the suit. Bush estimates that the city paid $200,000 to its attorney Howard Saxton to cover the case.
Cities must, by state law, respond to public records requests within five days.
However, Prosser city staff members often complained that Loges buried them with so many, they couldn't keep up and missed some. At one point, they estimated two City Hall clerks were spending one out of every five days on the job meeting Loges' demands.
They often didn't understand the requests in the first place, Warden said.
"Sometimes his requests, we didn't know what he meant," Warden said.
Loges once submitted a letter asking for a sign application, then returned about five minutes later to make a public records request for his original letter. He claims he just wanted a receipt and the staff wouldn't give it to him.
Such disputes are not uncommon for small towns that can't afford to designate an employee to records, said Luann Hopkins, a policy analyst for the Association of Washington Cities."It's not an excuse, just an explanation," Hopkins said.
Several bills in the 2009 state legislature aimed to take the pressure off, she said.
One would have raised the limit on the cost of copies. Another would have allowed cities to deny requests to people who had unpaid balances from previous requests. Still another would have set up a court procedure to determine when records requests amounted to harassment.
They all failed.
Since the lawsuit, the city of Prosser has hired a city clerk and deputy city clerk to help process records requests. The duty was previously handled by Cathleen Koch, both the city clerk and finance director at the time. City staff also have posted more information on the city Web site.
As a result, public records requests have dropped significantly, while Loges said he has "calmed down."
He has filed only nine requests so far this year.
There have been several high-profile public records cases in Central Washington this year.
In June, a judge ordered the state Department of Labor and Industries to pay a Benton City man more than $500,000 for failing to comply with his 2007 public records request. That case, however, is in limbo after the state Supreme Court rejected another open records case that could have a bearing on it.
The small town of Mesa, north of the Tri-Cities, is considering bankruptcy or disincorporation after being hit with $246,000 in attorney fees and legal penalties for violations related to the open records law filed against the city by its former mayor.
* Ross Courtney can be reached at 509-930-8798 or rcourtney@yakimaherald.com.
EDITOR'S NOTE: This story has been corrected from an earlier version in which comments were wrongly attributed to Larry Loges. While Loges said he questioned whether he’d get a favorable outcome in his open records lawsuit against the city of Prosser had the case gone to trial, he did not state or imply that he distrusts judges.
Larry Loges is a dog. He should seriously look at what he's accomplished and ask himself if he's proud of screwing things up and causing unneccesarry work and expense. He hasn't made things better, he's just made a name for himself. I don't live in Prosser, I don't know any of the people involved, I only read the papers and opinion blogs. I do know of Larry, when I used to work in Prosser years ago. I thought he was a schmuck then, and still do. Way to go Loges.
Report ViolationDoesn't Larry Loges look like Judge Alvin 'J.P' Valkenheiser in the movie Nothing But Trouble with Dan Aykroyd?
Report Violationthehellyousay - you are one sick little puppy lost in a world he does not understand. You admit not knowing any of the subjects involved in this story of pathetic city government in Prosser. Your next problem is you accept what is written in this paper as fact when all of us that know the reporter, Ross Courtney, know that he is biased and sloppy in his reporting. He once testified against Loges in a formal hearing and then wrote about the subject in the next days paper. A big NO-NO in newspaper reporting. So, you have a reporter that has testified against the subject of a report still covering that subject in subsequent articles. Get a clue dude, and do some basic research before you stick your foot in your mouth.
Loges should have gotten 10 times what he was given as that is the only way this disgusting city administration will learn anything from this situation. Remember, if the city had followed the law and handed Loges public documents, as they are required by law, he requested then the city would not have had to pay Loges anything nor would they have had to spend another $200,000 defending their illegal action. The city's cost would have been some staff time and copying time. Nothing near the half million it cost them to prove to all of us just what jerks our city staff can be.
Just my opinion of course, but at least I know the parties involved in this story.
Larry Brunelle
THE Prosser Watchdog
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?

RSS
E-mail
Print
Comments