Noise level uproar over proposed ORV regulations

Hundreds turn out to argue both sides before county commission
by Pat Muir
Yakima Herald-Republic
Noise level uproar over proposed ORV regulations
KRIS HOLLAND/Yakima Herald-Republic
Steve Agnew speaks to Yakima County Commissioners about easing restrictions on off-road vehicle use in the county during a special public hearing at the Yakima Convention Center Tuesday, April 21, 2009. He, along with other off-road vehicle users, wants Yakima County to loosen its current rules regarding ORV use.

Email_black_18  E-mail           Print_black_18  Print            Talk_black_18  Comments
Advertisement

 

YAKIMA, Wash. -- The standing-room-only crowd at Tuesday’s public hearing on Yakima County off-road-vehicle rules spilled into the hallways, shouted from the wings, and gave the county commissioners plenty to think about.

More than 300 people, many in motorcycle gear, packed a room that had only about 200 chairs, to argue the matter. The meeting was held at the Yakima Convention Center because the commissioners knew it would attract a crowd.

Both sides made property-rights arguments. Proponents of expanding off-road-vehicle use argued they ought to be free from enforcement for simply riding dirt bikes on their own land.

“The issue is whether a landowner has a right to make a reasonable use of their own property without having to ask permission to do so from a government agency,” said Mark Watson, president of the Yakima Valley Dust Dodgers Motorcycle and ATV Club.

The Dust Dodgers club, which has about 35 members, started this process last year by asking for new ORV rules.

Opponents argued that they, too, have property rights, including the right not to have to deal with noise and dust from ORV tracks next door.

“We all have property rights,” said Dan Fessler, who owns property in the Gleed area where neighbors use ORVs. “There are a lot of people who live in these zones who enjoy the peace and quiet. … They have a right to use their property, too.”

The issue arose last year when the Dust Dodgers, fed up with county enforcement they considered overbearing, proposed a change in county code.

As it is now, creating any ORV course or facility requires the county’s highest level of planning review and is limited to remote rural areas by county zoning ordinances. Use of an ORV on one’s own property is allowed only if the property is larger than 3 acres and no jumps, tracks or wear patterns are created.

Under the Dust Dodgers’ proposal, ORV courses would be allowed in more areas, including agricultural zones and rural residential zones with lots as small as 2.5 acres. The proposal also would limit ORV riding to between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m., mandate that it be used by the property owner’s family and guests with no commercial use allowed, limit the number of ORVs ridden at a time to five and impose noise restrictions.

Proponents believe that will allow reasonable ORV use, give kids something to do and keep them out of trouble. Steve Agnew of Selah-Naches Road northwest of Selah, whose children use the course he’s built on his property, said it’s the only outdoor fun his nephew from Yakima gets.

“He’s locked up in an apartment in Yakima,” Agnew said. “His fun is coming out to my property and riding.”

ORV riding is a fine activity, said Bob Olsen, an opponent of the expansion, but it has its place. The argument that people should be able to do whatever they please on their own property, however, does not work if they infringe on neighbors’ rights, he said.

“We’ve never had that right,” Olsen said. “In America or anywhere else.”

The meeting format essentially was just a line of people waiting their turn at the microphone. The commissioners — Rand Elliott, Mike Leita and Kevin Bouchey — said little and asked no questions.

Proponents of the expansion went first, followed by opponents. The commissioners did not allow rebuttals. The meeting lasted about 21⁄2 hours.

Though there were plenty of speakers on both sides of the issue, the crowd had a decidedly pro-ORV slant. Commission Chairman Elliott stopped the meeting several times to ask for civil discourse. In one instance, he threatened to end the meeting early when ORV expansion proponents were shouting over an opponent who had the podium.

“I’m not going to say this again,” Elliott said. “If you’re not going to give these speakers the respect they gave you, this meeting is over.”

The commissioners expect it will take weeks before they decide. They heard from dozens of people Tuesday night, on both sides of the issue, and expect to have a study session to mull over the testimony in two weeks or so.

“It was a passionate evening,” e Leita said. “We certainly heard a litany of issues from both sides. It’s obvious it won’t be an easy decision.”

Pat Muir can be reached at 577-7693, or at pmuir@yakimaherald.com.

 

Off-road vehicle use permits

• Yakima County

2008: 4,713

2007: 4,547

2006: 4,138

2005: 4,048

2004: 3,943

2003: 3,577

• Washington state

2008: 106,473

2007: 109,690

2006: 104,956

2005: 99,392

2004: 99,236

2003: 88,880



Commentsicon2
Posted by Read2Learn at 04/22/09 08:47AM        Post ID#: #3062

We have skate parks here...Why not do the same for the ORVers? Just put it someplace where the noise wouldn't be an issue.

Maybe the new owner of the speedway should consider this?

Report Violation
Posted by sjuan at 04/22/09 12:41PM        Post ID#: #3079

This is a tough one. I completely understand not wanting to hear ORV's when I'm in my yard, but the land owners also have a right to ride on their own property. Either way, someone's rights are infringed upon. Perhaps there could be a compromise where for lots smaller than so many acres ORV's would only be allowed on weekdays during work hours (9:00am-5:00pm). This would stop the noise during hours when most people are at home. Just an idea.

Report Violation
Posted by suzukiltr450 at 04/22/09 04:29PM        Post ID#: #3085

this is small problem that will only grow if this is passed. right now its orv's noise and dust. next it will be our windmachine and sprayers. then people will start complaining about all the employees in our fields and how they do not feel secure leaving thier homes. i think if you have no buisness living in the country then you have no buisness voicing a complaint. i can understand how orchardist can complain about dust. it is harmful to trees and people out riding to fast can be harmful to orchard employees. If i was living out in the country and my neighbors were out riding thier bikes and it was very noisy and i wanted to enjoy my back yard you know what i would do? i would simply go over and invite them over for a cold beverage and some conversation. then you get to enjoy your yard w/ company and your neighbors. this is not a new issue of any sorts these complaints have been going on for years. i own 250A of orchard in the valley, lived here my entire life. yes many members of our community are active orv'rs and orchardist. as a community we are able to comprimse with each other. thats how neighbors and communitys are supposed to work. to sum everything up. quit whinning and suck it up. if you have a problem deal w/ it yourself instead of being a pansy and hiding behind the government.

Report Violation
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?