Yakima City Council kills proposed curfew ordinance
YAKIMA HERALD-REPUBLIC
More 'Local'
- County home sales increase as prices fall in fourth quarter
- City manager turnover taking a toll in Sunnyside
- Yakima-based bread machine business sees rising success
- Admitted pimp gets five years in rape of 14-year-old, awaits trial on assault
- Spanish business classes coming up
- Free talk looks at cochlear implants
- Accounts set up for cancer treatment donations
Top Read
- State lab: Cheerleading tournament attendees sickened by norovirus
- Playhouse plight: Capitol Theatre ticket sales in serious decline
- Downtown Yakima bank robbed, suspect nabbed immediately
- Police look for info in case of missing woman
- ’I’ve got a big surprise for you’: 2 Powell boys’ social worker to recall final moments on ’20/20’
- Downtown bank robbery suspect gets greedy, arrested
- Prosser High School principal suspended for seven days
Emailed
- Playhouse plight: Capitol Theatre ticket sales in serious decline
- Property owner fined for altering creek's channel
- Supreme Court upholds tribal fishing rights after long battle
- Yakima-based bread machine business sees rising success
- Downtown Yakima bank robbed, suspect nabbed immediately
- Downtown bank robbery suspect gets greedy, arrested
- Clean Air Agency delays decision on dairy policy
YAKIMA, Wash. -- In a surprise move, the Yakima City Council killed a proposed curfew ordinance this morning.
Councilman Micah Cawley said the council voted not to move forward with an ordinance after police Chief Sam Granato said crime data didn’t justify one.
Last month, the council asked staff to explore a juvenile curfew modeled after a similar ordinance in Tacoma that has never been challenged in court.
The city has had a curfew ordinance on the books since 1994, but stopped enforcing it after the Supreme Court struck down a similar law in the Tacoma suburb of Sumner on the grounds it was unconstitutionally vague and not tailored narrowly enough.
During a meeting this morning at City Hall, Granato and Assistant City Attorney Cynthia Martinez said they doubted an ordinance would be an effective deterrent against gangs and graffiti.
Granato said an analysis of crime data — a key requirement by the courts for an ordinance to pass constitutional muster — did not justify a curfew.
“The data shows that the majority of juvenile felony arrests are from 2 to 8 p.m.,” he said.
He said the ordinance had other problems as well. Curfew violations are status offenses, and violators cannot be locked up. In addition, the high court’s Sumner decision made it clear that a civil rights violation could be heavily punished in a lawsuit.
“If we could get it done without getting our pants sued off, I’m all for it,” Granato said. “But we’re not baby sitters, and we’re not a taxi service.”
Cawley said he voted against tabling a proposed ordinance and would have preferred to keep crafting something that would pass constitutional muster.
“At some point, we’ve got to say enough is enough,” Cawley said. “We the people run this government, not the courts, not activist judges. It’s very frustrating.”
Comments
The Yakima Herald-Republic is rolling out Facebook Comments to allow users to discuss YH-R articles with other users. For more information about YH-R policies, please refer to the following:

RSS
E-mail
Print