RSSLegislators need to cut labor to avoid budget chaos in 2011
Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board
E-mail
Print
Comments
More 'Opinion'
- We've got feline fever. Go Wildcats!
- Trust would better ensure return on bailout bucks
- Trust judicial system: Try 9/11 suspects in Manhattan
- Agencies must prove they can work together on clean water
- Selah Creek plan reflects bold thinking
- Don't marginalize voters to gain more immediacy
- Actions of WSU, Congress clear away some of recession gloom
This editorial was published April 1, 2009
After waiting nearly three months since the start of the legislative session, we have finally gotten the first detailed look at how state lawmakers propose to bridge a $9 billion revenue shortfall.
The wait wasn't worth it.
Senate Democrats offered a budget on Monday, followed by House Democrats on Tuesday. While the Senate budget takes a sledge hammer to public education, the House version takes its aim at higher education, with colleges and universities facing up to a 17 percent cut and community colleges looking at a cutback of 13 percent. Both budget proposals also place extra burdens on health care coverage and create a few more gaping holes in the social safety net that's there to protect those who are the most vulnerable.
What the two proposed budgets for 2009-11 don't accomplish is a structured spending plan that will return this state to fiscal responsibility. The proposed cuts of nearly $4 billion fail to produce a significant and lasting reduction in labor costs. Instead, they rely too heavily on $3 billion in one-time federal stimulus funds and on questionable revenue raised through closing several tax loopholes.
Missing in this process is a profound change in the way the state operates. Without that, we could find ourselves in 2011 in the same spot we are today -- staring at a budget that's upside down.
Budget writers for the Senate and House will now head into final negotiations to hammer out a budget for the upcoming 2009-11 budget. It could be a tug-of-war. Even the fate of the state-run Yakima Valley School in Selah is unclear, with the Senate plan closing it down and the House budget keeping it open.
Let's look at some of the programs Senate Democrats wish to reduce that would affect those living here in the Yakima Valley.
The overall cutbacks of $1 billion in public education contain the lopping off of $253 million in levy equalization funds that help support property-poor districts. All 15 school districts in the Yakima Valley receive these funds, totaling some $35 million this year. The Yakima school district alone could see nearly $3 million wiped out, while districts like Grandview face a drop of $1.2 million.
Cuts to Medicaid reimbursement rates for hospitals and nursing homes under the Senate plan again would have a far greater impact here in Central Washington than elsewhere in the state. In Yakima County alone, nearly half of the residents are on some form of public assistance, which is primarily Medicaid.
Senate budget writers have hospitals across the state dealing with a reduction of $107 million in funds to help cover costs for patients who are unable to pay. For nursing homes, the two-year Senate budget has $38 million in cuts.
We find these savings especially painful since we see no significant attempt by majority Democrats to make sure state labor costs are part of their cost-cutting equation. If they had, these program cuts would be far less severe.
Both the Senate and House budgets do offer savings by not covering cost-of-living pay increases for state workers, college staffers and teachers.
However, the Senate version only projects a loss of 1,192 jobs in the general-government sector. That's simply not enough. If we are cutting back on all of these programs, why are we not more significantly cutting back on the state workers in those programs? The job losses represent only 1 percent of the state's 110,000 general-government jobs -- made up of 47,000 employees in higher education, 35,000 in human services and 11,000 in transportation.
What we fear now is a concerted move by lawmakers and interest groups to ask voters to raise taxes in order to avoid the deepest, most painful cuts -- namely to education and health care. That's a move we cannot support in light of the Legislature's unwillingness to confront the paramount issue of labor costs.
* Members of the Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board are Michael Shepard, Barbara Serrano, Spencer Hatton and Karen Troianello.
"In Yakima County alone, nearly half of the residents are on some form of public assistance, which is primarily Medicaid."
And we all know that a significant number of those are non-citizens, who legally, don't qualify for welfare services or State Medicaid. Furthermore, my guess is, the State hasn't cut back on employees because we will NEED all these people to administer the public welfare system, since the State DSHS refuses to acknowledge or properly follow our welfare eligibility requirements and laws. Instead, they will kick the GAO people off the rolls, who are the least expensive to the system, ($339 per month - and that has to be PAID BACK after disability kicks in!). There are 16,000 people currently in that program, a paltry segment of our population indeed! These people desperately need and deserve welfare help during the wait between L&I early dismissal and Social Security disability pay, yet we give welfare help to over three times that number of non-citizens, and they are not on the list to be cut from the rolls. What's up with that? Where are our priorities?
non residents cannot recieve any medical help unless they meet the criteria as everyone else.(65 yrs or older, blind, pregnate, minor, or disabled) on top of that they have to have an emergant condition. Non residents do not qualify for GAU at all.
I believe the whole system is fualty and needs an overhall. I know becuase I work very closely with the agency and I see so many mistakes made on cases that it makes me wonder how much money is spent just on mistakes and the crappy work that I sometimes see. I also come across burnt out social workers that just need to quit or leave the agency as they cannot provide courteous service to the public.
There is no real satisfying answer to these grinding questions. We have created an attractive society and medical system, and it is no fault of those who want a better life. We either do what is right morally, or we do not, so the question is, "what sort of Americans are we?" Do we do what is right, or do we just simply kill all those who are attracted to our country?
There are really enough of us to turn this around, but do we have the resolve to be selfless enough to do the work that is needed? We must all pitch in if we hope to solve this cultural and societal dilemma. Are you willing, or is it someone else's responsibility?
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?
