RSSDefamation suit settled out of court
Bonlender gets cash, apology from Enseys in defamation caseYakima Herald-Republic
E-mail
Print
Comments
More 'Local'
- New concept and new look planned for State Fair Park
- Volunteer judges offer to ease backlog of civil court cases
- Hitchhiker? DNA leads to husband
- Home custody escapee back in jail
- Mabton mayor pushes to hire Selah ex-police chief
- Account to benefit Dale Carpenter
- Sunnyside hires firm to find new manager
YAKIMA, Wash. -- Ron Bonlender's defamation lawsuit against Rick Ensey, the candidate who wrested away his Yakima City Council seat, has been settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.
Bon-
lender sued Ensey and his wife, Diane, immediat-ely after losing his council seat in 2007. He accused the Enseys of using a political blog written anonymously by Diane Ensey to smear him by posting unfounded rumors of drunken driving.
The suit was settled Tuesday following a lengthy mediation session in Seattle and averted the need for a civil trial set for next month in Yakima County Superior Court.
In addition to the undisclosed cash figure, the Enseys also agreed to issue a brief public apology. Both sides also agreed not to disparage each other in interviews with the news media on the subject of the lawsuit.
Ensey, who is entering his second year on the council, said Wednesday a confidentiality provision requested by Bonlender prevented him from saying how much money changed hands.
"It is what it is," he said of the settlement, adding, "I'm just happy it's over with, and I'm sure he's happy it's over with. I've put it out of my head and I'm moving forward."
Bonlender acknowledged that he signed a confidential agreement but said he would have no problem releasing the figure, which he described as "substantial," if Ensey wanted to.
"He can say what the amount is if he wants to," Bonlender said.
The settlement comes on the heels of several pretrial decisions that had not gone in the Enseys' favor. Their request for a change of venue was turned down, then a judge refused to throw out the case on summary judgment.
On her now-defunct blog InsideYakima.com, Diane Ensey was writing under the pseudonym "Publius" and in a post on Oct. 4, 2007, she recounted a conversation with a friend. In it, she said the friend had relatives who believed Bonlender had been arrested several times for drunken driving and that it was being covered up by the police, city officials and the Yakima Herald-Republic.
In a court hearing last November, the Enseys' lawyer, Nancy T. McKinley, argued that the blog post was protected free speech and that public figures like Bonlender have to prove malice, not just indifference to truth.
McKinley said Diane Ensey meant only to make the point that the Democratic activist was subject to the same kind of mudslinging that Democrats used against Rep. Charles Ross, R-Naches, during the 2006 campaign when both men were running for a 14th District House seat.
During that race, Democrats publicized a 1998 DUI arrest of Ross, who later pleaded guilty to an amended charge of first-degree negligent driving.
"There was a rumor (about Bonlender). She discussed the rumor," McKinley told the court.
But Bonlender's attorney, Blaine Tamaki, countered that a jury was better suited than a judge to determine context.
Not only was Diane Ensey blogging anonymously about her husband's political opponent, Tamaki noted, it had since come out in pretrial testimony that the source of the alleged DUI rumor were her own
in-laws.
The judge sided with Tamaki and refused to dismiss the case.
* Chris Bristol can be reached at 577-7748 or cbristol@yakimaherald.com.
The Enseys' apology
"Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bonlender: Diane truly regrets writing the blog post to the extent that it cast doubt on Mr. Bonlender's character. We apologize to Mr. and Mrs. Bonlender for any distress this may have caused them. Rick and Diane Ensey"
Dear Mr. Bonlender,
Thank you for bringing your sleezy Chicago style politics to Yakima.
Dear Mr. Lobo...or should I write Mr. Lowblow...In you sleezy post you did not get specific. Why don't you expound on your vast knowledge of "sleezy Chicago style politics" that Mr. Bonlender brought to Yakima?
Report ViolationWhat, aamodtdb, so Bonlender can sue him too? I don't know ANY SINGLE PERSON who read the blog until the Yakima H-R made a big deal of it. If they would have left it alone, hardly anyone outside the small circle of friends of Enseys, would have even know about it - and they probably carried the same sympathies as the Enseys anyway, so where is the harm? Regardless, Bonlender is in error to think that the Enseys lost the election for him - he did that all by himself. He alone, can take full credit for losing his council seat based upon his actions in office. The voters were not happy with his performance and told him so by voting him out. I believe this newspaper was the biggest player who caused the problem to escalate into a defamation case. Of course, they will probably remove my comment on this subject as they have done in the past on others, for not agreeing with their point of view.
Report ViolationPublius? Is that YOU Publius? Are you now lobo?
Defending your name against some twit that thinks she's above the law is not "sleazy". What the twit did WAS.
Mr. Lobo - Did you read the article? Have you followed this story? The sleezy politics in this particular case, orginated with the Enseys - they settled out of court because they were going to be convicted of defammation AGAINST Ron Bonlender - not the other way around. Your anger is baffleing and without logic.
Report ViolationSorry Ron,your a nice fellow and all that but her blog was not why I voted against you.
Report Violation
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?
