Four-day school week? Careful what you wish for
Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board
More 'Opinion'
- We've got feline fever. Go Wildcats!
- Trust would better ensure return on bailout bucks
- Trust judicial system: Try 9/11 suspects in Manhattan
- Agencies must prove they can work together on clean water
- Selah Creek plan reflects bold thinking
- Don't marginalize voters to gain more immediacy
- Actions of WSU, Congress clear away some of recession gloom
This editorial appears in the Yakima Herald-Republic on Feb. 1, 2009.
A measure allowing school districts to embrace a four-day school week has a big plus. It gives districts the freedom to reconfigure the school week as administrators, teachers and parents see fit.
But that freedom may come at a heavy cost.
Sponsored by our local legislators from the 14th and 15th districts, Senate Bill 5112 and its mirror image in the other chamber, House Bill 1292, would permit the state Board of Education to offer waivers from the 180-day school-year edict. While the numbers of days may be changed, the waiver would not allow schools to fiddle with the mandatory instructional hours of 1,000 per student per school year.
Sen. Jim Honeyford, R-Sunnyside, says he was approached by several smaller school districts seeking the waiver. The requests came during the height of the gas increases last summer when diesel fuel topped off at more than $4 a gallon.
One of the reasons to go to a four-day school week would be to reduce costs, especially for far-flung districts like Bickleton, which serves 105 students in an area of more than 500 square miles. That's a lot of diesel fuel that Bickleton could save by only busing students four days a week instead of five.
The reduced week does have its devotees in 17 other states, including Oregon and California.
Of course, the downside of this shortened week and longer school days gets steep very quickly. What about those students with single parents or with both parents working? In low-income communities like those in the Yakima Valley, this "free Friday" could be a real problem in terms of child care and for older students dealing with poor choices that lead to delinquency. Fridays could soon become an endless reprise of the movie "Home Alone" -- only with darker consequences for the child being left in solitude.
While extending the school day may be beneficial to those in science labs, students in other classes may lose their focus. Also, if a student or teacher misses a day during the shortened week, the loss in instructional time is considerable, roughly 20 percent, according to a bill analysis by a team of nonpartisan legislative staff members.
And if Friday is the day to be off from school, what happens to sporting events and extracurricular activities? Scheduling could become a nightmare.
Also, what about collective bargaining agreements? Even if teachers embrace the concept, what about the classified employees who might balk at the idea? What about reduced salaries for cafeteria workers and bus drivers?
Then there's the question of student safety during the winter. It's dark out there right now, and by extending the school day during those four days that kids are in classes, the chance of harm coming to those who trek home only increases.
Counting on cost savings may also be spurious.
If a school building is, indeed, shut down for a full day, proponents estimate a 20 percent savings in fuel, food, utilities and possibly wages of hourly staff.
However, that doesn't mean utility bills will drop like a rock. In fact, if the school year needs to be extended into the summer, as may be the case, air-conditioning costs will probably eat up what savings are gained by cranking down the thermostats in the colder months.
Yes, giving school districts the freedom to choose is a worthy goal. But we don't see many of the state's nearly 300 districts jumping on board.
And one cautionary note to the smaller, rural districts like Bickleton: If it sounds too good to be true, it is.
* Members of the Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board are Michael Shepard, Barbara Serrano, Spencer Hatton and Karen Troianello.
A generation or more ago, this may have been a good idea. Now, it is plainly stupid for all the reasons mentioned in the article and a few more I can think of. I believe that, in the long run, we would exacerbate the problem and actually increase costs, not save them. However, I have no problem with lengthening the school day, remaining on the 5 day school week, and taking the proportionate time off for summer vacation. I think more benefit would be realized and associated costs would be reduced in much the same ways they would be otherwise.
Report ViolationDo we really think our kids can pay attention for the extended school hours? No way. Besides, I can only imagine the law suits because of 5 or 6 year old kids being left home alone on Fridays.
The only upside I could see is day care and latch key programs would be flooded on Fridays.
Jim's comment.."Do we really think our kids can pay attention for the extended school hours? No way."
Of course they could, but they won't until all of the adults in their lives quit treating them like they are breakable and weak. An eight hour school day would prepare kids for the 8 to 10 hour work week they will face as adults. There is no up-side to day care or latch key, versus being in school.
oops..ment to type...8 to 10 hour work day...(not week)...
Report Violation
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?

RSS
E-mail
Print
Comments