Rural fire chiefs voice concerns about EMS levy
Yakima Herald-Republic
More 'Local'
- Chinook Pass closed due to heavy snow, avalanche danger
- Forum will focus on developmental disabilities
- Friendly 'surgeons' will mend dolls, stuffed animals
- Toys for Tots collection begins
- Mattawa man injured in rollover
- Memorial held for slain Seattle officer
- State agencies sign water quality roadmap
Could Yakima's proposed EMS levy cause the failure of the county's existing levy of the same name when it expires in 2012? Rural fire chiefs are afraid it could.
The potential for voter confusion over the twin tax measures has led to mixed feelings for Gleed fire Chief Jim Kohl, whose tiny force of 25 volunteers stands to lose $40,000 for equipment and training if the county levy fails.
"It's kind of an awkward situation, really," he said Satur-
day. "We want to be good neigh-bors with folks in Yakima ... but it would be a real impact on us."
At issue is Yakima's proposed Emergency Medical Services levy, which is slated for a city-only vote-by-mail special election Feb. 3. Ballots went out last week.
If approved, the levy will add 25 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value. That works out to $3 to $4 a month for the average homeowner in Yakima.
Yakima has by far the smallest fire department for a city its size in Washington, and fire Chief Charlie Hines says he needs the extra $1.3 million in tax revenue to hire more firefighters.
The measure has not been a slam-dunk for Hines, whose plan to hire paramedics has led to accusations the city will be unneccesarily duplicating services already being provided at no cost to taxpayers by two private ambulance companies based in Yakima.
Another criticism is that the city's levy will undercut the existing countywide EMS levy.
The county's levy has been around for close to 20 years. Unlike the city's proposed levy, which has no sunset clause, the county's levy must be renewed every 10 years or it expires.
That's coming up in three years, which doesn't seem like a long time away to Kohl, an orchardist who, like most of his volunteers, has a regular day job.
The bulk of the Gleed fire department's budget, about $175,000, comes from a districtwide tax base. It goes to paying off new equipment and other expenses, such as a fire station on North Gleed Road that was built in 1996 and will be paid off this year.
The additional $40,000 he gets every year from the county EMS levy is invaluable for making ends meet, Kohl says.
"We're just worried that we might have a hard time in a couple years getting people to vote for it again, especially folks in Yakima," he said.
Kohl's concerns are echoed by Selah fire Chief Jerry Davis, whose agency also covers the greater Selah and Wenas area known as District 2.
Selah gets about $150,000 every year from the county EMS levy. Davis says he's worried that Yakima voters could get confused about the county levy so soon on the heels of the city's levy -- or worse.
"We don't want them to say, 'Well, we're paying into the Yakima one, why should we pay the county one too?'" he said.
Hines says he under-stands the fears the "rurals" have. That's because nobody gets a bigger chunk of the county's EMS levy -- close to $1 million -- than his own agency.
"If the county levy doesn't pass in 2012, I've got to lay off eight of my own guys," he said. "If it fails, I'm practically back to where I started."
As a result, he has promised publicly to promote the county levy. He said he's confident voters will understand the necessity of the two levies and vote accordingly.
"If we had foresaw it as a major obstacle, we wouldn't have pushed this thing," he said, adding, "Bottom line is we're in it together. We're all on the same team."
Of course, the confusion between the two levies will be diminished if the Yakima levy fails next month. So are any of the rural chiefs telling their friends to vote against the city's levy?
"I'm not saying either way," replied Davis, the
Selah chief. "I just don't want people to be confused."
* Chris Bristol can be reached at 577-7748 or at cbristol@yakimaherald.com.
here is a little more insite into the fire/ems system in the yakima area. about 7 months ago yakima fire stopped calling for automatic mutual aid from nieghboring fire districts, staffed with a combination of full time and duty crews providing almost 24/7 fire and ems coverage to thier respective districts, a longstanding practice that has worked for years. instead of using these readily available units for primary response to the incident they are now called to man the vacant city stations only to be called in to help with overhaul, the dirty work. the rual fire chiefs should probably be on the lookout for anexation of their districts by the city of yakima because the number of firefighter/paramedics they want to hire will not add 1 firefighter to each engine, 5 stations with 3 shifts per station equiling 15 new firefighters, however it does add up to a new station at current staffing levels, 4 firefighters per shift per station equiling 12 new firefighters. currently the city of yakima has within its boundries 7 paramedic staffed ambulances, 1 more then the city of seattle, that if they don't arrive at a call before yakima city fire usually are close enough to watch the firefighters walk into the residence and a good paramedic is going to use that time difference to provide to same care that the current emt level staffing provides. after years in the local fire/ems system i can tell you that 2 paramedics on a scene can be very problematic, agency anamosities, and just plain differing treatment plans can have a negitive outcome for patients. if there has been a decrease in the quality of care being provided it is because of the saturation of the local ems system with paramedics, the more difficult calls that a paramedic runs the better that paramedic becomes. adding more paramedics to the system will further dilute the system increasing the chanses of a mistake. if the city of yakima needs more firefighters they need to find a way to fund more firefighters and not hire paramedics, at 25-30% more a year, because everybody else has paramedics.
Report Violation
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?

RSS
E-mail
Print
Comments