Guest worker program raises more red flags than solutions
Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board
More 'Opinion'
- State government, like everyone else, must bite the bullet
- Selah Creek is part of integrated approach to water-storage issue
- We've got feline fever. Go Wildcats!
- Trust would better ensure return on bailout bucks
- Trust judicial system: Try 9/11 suspects in Manhattan
- Agencies must prove they can work together on clean water
- Selah Creek plan reflects bold thinking
Upon further review, we don't think a guest worker program to fingerprint and photograph all nontribal workers on the Yakama reservation and collect 50 cents for every hour they work is such a good idea after all.
Schaptakay Labor Works LLC has been licensed by the tribal council to develop and carry out a for-profit guest worker program on the 1.2 million-acre reservation.
While we originally thought it was worth exploring, follow-up reports would indicate that the program falls well short of being a bona fide immigration reform effort. A guest worker program is only one part of needed immigration reform and this local proposal smacks of being more of an employer shakedown than a solution for workforce shortages.
The fee would raise about $12.6 million a year for the company, and we're not sure what's in it for the employers, except for a significant cost of doing business. A firm with 25 full-time nontribal employees, working 40-hour weeks, would pay $26,000 at 50 cents per hour for 52 weeks.
Schaptakay co-owners Hal Kent and Wendell Hannigan said their plan is to assure a legal and stable work force on the reservation while ridding it of much crime. But we're not sure how tracking workers in the company's database would do that. And the phrase "all nontribal workers" would involve more than just immigrant labor, legal or illegal, working in the fields and packing houses. It seems it would extend to the likes of teenagers working at McDonald's, too.
Mike Gempler, executive director of the Washington Growers League, said: "When I was first approached by Schaptakay, I thought it was to help solve a labor problem and provide workers. But that doesn't appear to be what this is about at all. All of a sudden this has turned into a tax issue rather than a guest worker program."
Gempler also raises a legitimate concern when he questions what services employers would receive in return for the fee, adding that guest worker programs usually provide employers with workers.
It's a legitimate concern. It's at best unclear what the fee is for or what the company would do with the information it gathers.
We're reminded of another fee scheme. The Seattle City Council decided that beginning in January shoppers must pay 20 cents for each plastic or paper bag they use at grocery, drug and convenience stores in the city. The stores will keep 5 cents from each bag to cover costs associated with administering the fee. Small stores that gross less than $1 million a year would keep the entire 20-cent fee.
The city would use $1.5 million of the expected $10 million in annual bag-fee revenue to provide at least one reusable bag to each household. The idea is to discourage paper and plastic by slapping a tax on them (rather than an outright ban). What we see happening is establishment, and future growth, of a new bureaucracy that really doesn't solve the problem -- but generates millions in tax revenue for the city.
We don't see how a 50-cent per hour fee on the reservation is going to solve the immigration and illegal work force problems, either. And there's no clear information available on who would get the $12.6 million it would generate.
The owners of the new Yakama business say the basic issue is tribal sovereignty, which no one can dispute when it embraces tribal members on tribal lands. The historical jurisdiction problem on the Yakama Reservation is the fact that land within the exterior boundaries is a checkerboard of tribal and nontribal ownership.
It's not clear if the tribe could require reservation businesses situated on nontribal land to register their workers. U.S. Assistant Attorney Tom Rice in Spokane told our reporter that he wouldn't comment on the matter unless the tribal government attempted such a move.
We would suggest he study the jurisdiction parameters of this proposal and be ready to comment in detail.
The tribe has the authority to track and document workers on its reservation without any federal involvement so long as it's not bringing workers in from other countries, according to federal Customs and Immigration Services spokeswoman Sharon Rummery in San Francisco.
The question becomes: Can the tribe charge a fee on nontribal members on nontribal land?
Immigration, including guest worker programs, is a federal responsibility that extends beyond the reservation boundaries. Let the feds and Congress deal with guest worker programs, and all the other elements of immigration reform.
* Members of the Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board are Michael Shepard, Sarah Jenkins, Bill Lee and Karen Troianello.
SEE WHAT YOU CAN DO...?
37 million illegal aliens according to the Tucson border patrol. An additional half-million are coming every year.
In 1996 Illegal aliens were then displacing 730,000 American workers a year, so says Rice University.
Taxpayers are supporting parasite businesses that hire illegal foreign nations. Democrats have underfunded the new border fence.
It is estimated that the cost to supporting illegal aliens is over a $1trillion dollars a year in government handouts.
Read about www.judicialwatch.org winning court cases against parasite employers, illegal immigrant groups and corrupt politicians.
www.numbersusa.com is your HQ, to find the ugly facts not lies. www.capsweb.org has different petitions to fight the illegal alien pestilence.
Read about the unrevealed war going on at www.americanpatrol.com
Our future free of OVERPOPULATION, is up to YOU?
I was at a meeting last night where one of the founders of this idea spoke to clarify the issues. He admitted that the tribe expects anyone who is not a tribal member to be covered by the rule. Anyone who works on the rez would be considered a guest worker unless they are a tribal member. Whoever employs them, even in incorporated areas such as Toppenish would have to pay the hourly fee. WHen confronted, Wendell said he "would have to make an "undercover side deal" to cover special cases, such as for whites that weren't illegal aliens, that would establish some kind of rebate program for those employees". This is nothing more than another tribal wild-hair scam to force non-tribal members to fork over more money to the tribe. With immense problems of alcoholism and lives wasted in non-productive hours doing nothing everyday but laying about collecting their allotments, these guys want an increase in pay, nothing more, nothing less. The whole idea would only make matters worse, and is highly racially motivated as well, with not much to do with illegal aliens.
Report Violation
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?

RSS
E-mail
Print
Comments