Neighbors appeal county OK for all-year gravel crushing

By David Lester
Yakima Herald-Republic

Links
Email_black_18  E-mail           Print_black_18  Print            Talk_black_18  Comments
Advertisement

More 'Local'

  1. Chinook Pass closed due to heavy snow, avalanche danger
  2. Forum will focus on developmental disabilities
  3. Friendly 'surgeons' will mend dolls, stuffed animals
  4. Toys for Tots collection begins
  5. Mattawa man injured in rollover
  6. Memorial held for slain Seattle officer
  7. State agencies sign water quality roadmap
More Stories:   Today's News | This Week

 

Several neighbors are appealing a county decision that would allow Columbia Ready Mix to crush gravel year-round from its pit northwest of Wapato.

The appeals by two companies and a citizen contend the county ignored evidence about dust, traffic, noise and other issues in reaching its decision.

The Columbia pit is on Lateral 1 Road among orchards and residences northwest of Wapato.

Pride Packing Co. of Wapato, one of the appellants and a producer of fruit, wants the decision to be found out of compliance with state environmental law. The company, represented by Yakima attorney Jamie Carmody, wants a full environmental impact statement prepared.

A hearing on the appeals is scheduled for 2 p.m. Nov. 25 in the basement of the county courthouse, 128 N. Second St.

County hearing examiner
pro tem Pat Spurgin will conduct the hearing.

Columbia Ready Mix wants to crush gravel and haul the raw material year-round from the 78-acre site, a level of activity county commissioners denied two years ago. Commissioners forbid summer excavation and all crushing at the pit to reduce neighbor impacts.

Columbia later filed a request to add those functions, saying the mining operation wasn't economically feasible with the county-imposed limits.

In response to the request, county planners have concluded the increased activity would not affect the environment as long as mitigation measures are followed.

The neighbors, however, contend planners used the original application as the basis for approval and did not take into account evidence submitted at hearings on the proposal and the limits commissioners imposed.

Carmody said dust from rock-crushing poses a risk to summer fruits like peaches and nectarines his client grows nearby.

Pat Andreotti, one of the attorneys representing neighbor Jordan Arreola and the former Superior Asphalt of Yakima, said his clients want a new environmental review conducted that includes all the evidence and testimony.

He said the county needs to explain how mitigation measures deemed inadequate by county commissioners are now sufficient to resolve the concerns of neighbors.

 



Commentsicon2
Log in or Register to leave a comment.

Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g., you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason. Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the "report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

Registered User?