Paper asks Supreme Court to review ruling
Yakima Herald-Republic
More 'Local'
- Oregon truck driver dies in crash
- Suicidal man subdued on I-82 overpass
- Hatton: With plenty of unsolicited help, Slovenia beckons
- Voters to decide slew of school levies on Tuesday
- Family of former Yakima woman devastated by homicide
- Hastings seeks Impact Aid grants for area school districts
- Greyhound leaving downtown station after 50 years
Top Read
- State lab: Cheerleading tournament attendees sickened by norovirus
- ’I’ve got a big surprise for you’: 2 Powell boys’ social worker to recall final moments on ’20/20’
- Admitted pimp gets five years in rape of 14-year-old, awaits trial on assault
- Yakima-based bread machine business sees rising success
- Man threatening to jump from I-82 overpass subdued
- Okanogan couple charged in faith-healing death
- Search on for new Yakima city manager — again
Emailed
- Yakima-based bread machine business sees rising success
- ’I’ve got a big surprise for you’: 2 Powell boys’ social worker to recall final moments on ’20/20’
- State lab: Cheerleading tournament attendees sickened by norovirus
- Search on for new Yakima city manager — again
- Saturday Soapbox | Investment in EMT training more than pays for itself
- Greyhound leaving downtown station after 50 years
The Yakima Herald-Republic has asked the state's highest court to review a local ruling that keeps secret the taxpayer-financed costs of defending a man convicted of aggravated first-degree murder.
At issue is how $1.5 million was spent to defend Jose "Junior" Sanchez who was convicted of killing a 21-year-old man and the man's 3-year-old daughter in 2005. He is serving life without parole.
The records of spending were sealed when prosecutors were considering the death penalty and have remained sealed.
The newspaper contends the records should be open under the state's Public Records Act.
While the court is exempt from the state records law, the newspaper believes the law applies in this case because of an unusual arrangement in which Yakima County Superior Court Judge James Lust was appointed to serve as a "budget judge" to review billing requests from defense attorneys in the case. A different judge handled Sanchez's actual trial.
Attorneys for the newspaper argued that Lust's handling of the records was inherently administrative, not judicial. But a late June ruling, visiting Kittitas County Superior Court Judge Michael Cooper disagreed, and refused to release the records.
The Herald-Republic is now asking the state Supreme Court to review Cooper's ruling because if the case is taken to the state Court of Appeals it's unlikely to end there. That's because whatever decision that court renders is likely to be appealed by the losing side.
"We need the state Supreme Court to rule on this as an important public records case," said Sarah Jenkins, editor of the Herald-Republic. "While we recongize the rights of defendants in court, we are asking that the justices also recognize the right of taxpayers to know how their money is being spent."
Arguing against opening the billing records are attorneys Gregory Click and Susan Wilk of the Washing-ton Appellate Project, which is appealing Sanchez's criminal conviction.
While the two Seattle attorneys did not represent Sanchez at his Superior Court trial and are not responsible for his $1.5 million defense, they contend opening the records would jeopardize their client's opportunities in an appeal.
It is not clear when, or even if, the Supreme Court will accept direct review of the Sanchez case.
* Chris Bristol can be reached at 577-7748 or cbristol@yakimaherald.com.
Comments
The Yakima Herald-Republic is rolling out Facebook Comments to allow users to discuss YH-R articles with other users. For more information about YH-R policies, please refer to the following:

RSS
E-mail
Print