Emotions flare as Naches man found not guilty of murder
Yakima Herald-Republic
More 'Local'
- Valley students show an eye for art
- Nation in distress leaves lasting impact on Yakima aid workers
- 02/08/10 News quiz answers
- No drive for students to learn to drive?
- Officials seek information about horse-shooting incident near Outlook
- Heart of the matter
- A touch of tech enhances math class
YAKIMA -- A Naches man charged with murdering his longtime girlfriend two years ago was found not guilty by a Yakima Superior Court jury on Friday, causing both sides of the case to erupt with emotion.
Supporters of 26-year-old Michael R. Spencer jumped from their seats, shouting with joy and clapping triumphantly while the victim's family and friends rushed out of the courtroom in a fury. The verdict was read at 3 p.m. after nearly a day's deliberation, with heavy security in place.
"It came out just like it should have," Spencer's mother, Beverly, said outside the courtroom in tears.
State prosecutors had charged Spencer with premeditated murder for the death of Rebecca S. Tatum on Nov. 5, 2006. Spencer insisted throughout the trial that he had fired only one shot in a tragic accident, but prosecutors argued she was shot multiple times in cold blood. Tatum was 23 and five weeks pregnant when she died.
Animosity and tensions have been simmering between the two families since the night of the shooting, culminating at the end of a weeklong trial.
Ike and Beverly Spencer, who have had custody of the couple's two children -- Payton, 6, and Summer, 4 -- will now return the kids to their father.
"They haven't seen their daddy in so long," said Beverly Spencer. "They were praying last night to see him."
Spencer will be dismissed with prejudice, so charges can't be filed again.
Outside the courtroom, Ike Spencer, the defendant's father, spoke triumphantly to reporters.
"It was an accident, it was an accident all the time," he said. "My son never would have done it on purpose. We loved Becca like a daughter, but we know Michael never would have done something like that on purpose."
But the Tatums said they were devastated by the jury's decision.
"He just got away with murdering my daughter, man!" shouted James Peddicord, Tatum's father, as he exited the courtroom.
Diana Tatum, the victim's mother, fainted in the courthouse lobby and was taken to a hospital in an ambulance.
Roxann Kintner, the victim's sister, declined to speak to reporters, her face red with tears. She testified during the trial that Rebecca Tatum was going to leave Spencer the night of the shooting. State prosecutors said Spencer was controlling and paranoid and that he shot Tatum to keep her from leaving.
"I'm just totally shocked," Bernie Charron said after the verdict was read. She employed Tatum for more than a year before the shooting and regarded her as a member of the family.
"I don't understand why they came to that conclusion. I can't even grasp it," Charron said.
The jury of nine women and three men was escorted from the courthouse through a private exit.
John Crowley, Spencer's attorney, said the prosecution was unduly confident during the trial. He said the couple had a normal relationship with ups and downs like everybody else. Witnesses who were close to Tatum were justified in their feeling of loss and anger, Crowley said, but those feelings affected the accuracy of their testimony.
During closing arguments on Thursday, attorneys from both sides of the case emphasized the findings of two forensic experts, who reached contradictory conclusions about the number of gunshots that killed Tatum.
Dr. Daniel Selove, a forensic pathologist who testified for state prosecutors, said he recovered a bullet from Tatum's chest during his autopsy that didn't line up with other wounds. He concluded that two or more bullets killed her.
But Kay Sweeney, a forensic scientist who testified for the defense, said his microscopic and fiber analyses of Tatum's clothing led him to conclude only a single bullet could have caused all seven wounds, especially because there was no hole in the shirt indicating a second bullet had entered.
State prosecutors responded by showing the jury the shirt Tatum was wearing, emphasizing its v-neck shape. They said there was no hole in the shirt corresponding with the chest wound because the shirt didn't cover that part of her body.
But the defense told jurors that the state was intentionally trying to deceive them. Crowley brought the shirt out again. This time, the shirt was assembled to cover the neck.
"Rebecca would have wanted the jury to know how she really wore her shirt that night," he said.
He said the shirt had been cut open for removal from Tatum's body, and that the shirt was not a v-neck when arranged properly.
Jeff Goldstein, a lawyer for the defense, said he believes the jury lost faith in the state's reliability when their argument about the shirt didn't seem to hold up.
"We don't see this as a victory," Crowley said. "We see it as vindication. We feel horrible that the Tatums lost a daughter and that a young woman lost her life. But we're grateful that Spencer's reputation was vindicated."
* Information from Herald-Republic reporter Chris Bristol was used in this report.
I was sickened to find out that the jury found this man not guilty of taking that young woman's life. How the jury can sleep at night after knowing they set a murderer free and wrecked a family is totally beyond anything i can comprehend. My thoughts, love and prayers are with Rebecca's family and friends. Although it's going to be even harder now, i hope they find some comfort in the days ahead.
Report ViolationWOW! I'm shocked! Based upon what I've read in this paper, I thought it was an open and shut case and that his goose was cooked for sure.
Report ViolationI guess the jury doubted the expert testimony from the state's forensic scientist. It's sad that two professionals cannot be together, both 100% certain, as to how many @#$% bullets were fired. You would think this would be easy to determine.
In this case however, it appears that it wasn't so and as a result a man was freed. I feel horrible for the girls family. They obviously feel that justice wasn't served.
Justice was served!!! Now Michael can be with his children that he has not seen in 2 years because of a restraining order that prevented him from seeing them. Daddy is home...
Report ViolationThis is ridiculous! What kind of justice system do we have here in Yakima? This man is guilty! He couldn't keep a job and relied on his girlfriend for everything. She supported him. God works in mysterious ways. What goes around comes around. The kids will never know there mom. They will never know how special of a person she was. Now they will be with there dad. Hopefully he can clean up his thus far wasted life and make a man out of himself for the sake of his kids. My thoughts and prayers are with the Tatum Family.
Report ViolationMy thoughts and prayers are with the Spencer family. Rebecca was treated like a daughter of their own. She, Michael and the chlidren lived with the Spencer Family (Great Grandparents)and Ike Spencer's parents on the same property for many years when times were hard. The Tatum's did not help in any way becacuse they could not do it with the life style they were living. They lived in 2 buses and did not have the means to help. The neighbor hood is very unsafe because it is known for gettng drugs. The Spencer's Great Grandparents provided the help for many years. They treated Rebeecca like their own Grand Daughter. As for their Great Grand Children they wanted nothing more than to have them around. Rebecca had to beg her parents (the Tatum's) to watch their children because it was too much for them to handle.
Praise the Lord that Daddy is home and Justice was served.
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?

RSS
E-mail
Print
Comments