Food-stamp increase can't come soon enough
Yakima Herald-Republic
More 'Opinion'
- Deportation? Let's use some common sense
- Valley voters never should be underestimated
- Forest Service needs to better plan, inform public of burns
- Tax credit will rev up first-time home buys over bleak winter
- Don't complain, do something about it-- Vote!
- Tuesday's election-- What we recommend
- R-71 is inconsistent, erodes sanctity of marriage
Here's the bad news:
While record-high gas prices have gotten almost all the attention as drivers struggle just to pay for necessary travel, the cost of some of the most basic foods have also risen at unheard of rates over the past year.
Consider these examples, comparing June 2008 to June 2007:
* Eggs have increased 95 percent.
* Milk is up 67 percent.
* Rice has increased 42 percent.
* Pasta -- as in the old standby mac & cheese -- is up 30 percent.
* Even fruits and vegetables overall are 20 percent more.
Every family feels the pinch, both at the pump and at the grocery check-out line.
But those hit hardest in Washington are the nearly 300,000 families who use food stamps to stretch their grocery dollars. The maximum benefits to a family of four is $542 a month, or $4.50 per day for each person. And that family of four, used as an example, cannot have a total gross household income of more than $26,900.
If that family of four has two adults working full time at minimum wage, its total household income would be $33,570 -- and they would be on their own to feed themselves and their two children.
But there is some good news for the state's poorest families:
This fall that gross income cap for Washington residents will increase to $42,000 for a family of four. Right now, that means an additional 23,000 families in Washington will be eligible for food stamps under the federal U.S. Department of Agriculture program.
One problem is that the Oct. 1 increase is nearly three months away, and with prices increasing at the rate they are today, who knows how much more our pennies will be pinched by then?
There may be some who quibble about the amount of that income-cap increase; today's cap is 130 percent of the federal poverty level, and it is going up to 200 percent.
Is that too much in one jump? Could there be an interim step, perhaps 165 percent or 170 percent of the poverty level?
There certainly could be -- but we would argue that while a smaller increase would be better than nothing, it wouldn't do nearly enough to help ease the pressure on families who are already turning to food banks in increasing numbers to supplement their income and food stamps.
The piece of the puzzle that would make this even better news for the hardest hit families would be an increase in the dollar amount of food stamps they may receive.
According to a spokesman for the state Department of Social and Health Services, which administers the federal program for the state of Washington, the "maximum allotment" -- now at $542 a month for a family of four -- will almost certainly go up this fall as well. But that's determined at the federal level by the USDA, and the state has yet to receive official word, either that there will definitely be an increase or how much.
We hope that word comes soon.
While raising the income cap will provide relief for additional families much in need of help buying groceries, that won't do anything for the families already receiving food stamps and unable to make them stretch through the month.
As a representative of food retailers statewide explained in a recent Seattle Post-Intelligencer article, "This is unprecedented; there have never been these kinds of (food price) increases all at once."
The spokeswoman -- Jan Gee, president of the Washington Food Industry Association -- blamed rising fuel costs for part of the spike in food prices. But the growing demand for ethanol -- which takes grain out of food production -- plus the weakening dollar and greater foreign demand for food are also factors.
The only problem we see with the planned increase as of Oct. 1 is that it isn't coming sooner.
Consider one more way of looking that the numbers: While these caps are based on gross household income, what families have to spend is actually their net income -- and put that way, the cap right now is $20,650. It will go up to about $32,300. Figuring the roughly 10 percent of their income that Americans spent for food in 2007, that new, higher cap works out to $3,230 for our family of four -- or $2.20 per person per day.
Since its inception in the early 1960s, the food-stamp program has become the nation's strongest line of defense against hunger.
We must continue to keep it strong when we need it most.
* Members of the Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board are Michael Shepard, Sarah Jenkins, Bill Lee and Karen Troianello.
On its face, it sounds like a nice gesture. However, until our state can overcome its humongous debt and until there is a concerted effort to identify who they are giving the benefits to, it shouldn't happen. For example, a huge number of food stamp recipients are immigrants. Of those, approximately 75% - 80 % are illegal. They are here working for greedy employers who pay them about half of what their work is really worth, forcing the workers to rely upon State welfare to fill in the gaps. This is made even worse by many who send a healthy part of their meager pay back to Mexico, and then go ion welfare and medicaid to make up the difference. The net result is Government subsidies to private business and also unidentified foreign aid, as well as a huge negative impact on local services and infrastructure that costs ME a good part of my fixed income!
These are facts that can't be denied, and it is simply no longer fair or reasonable to ignore them and ask us to pay for it all. It is time for the U.S. to follow the EU and give these people 30 days to clear out and go back where they came from or face jail time. Yes, we would then have to support them in jail, but at least we would know where they are and they could then be officially deported.
Yes, it sounds harsh, but we need to get a handle on this immense problem. Our Governor needs to direct her departments to pay more attention, or any attention at all, to the citizenship requirement for state benefits.
This specific problem is the reason that I-409 has been drafted and is now available for signatures. You should do an article on that.
"We" surely wouldn't people starving here in USA. As someone mentioned in a a letter to the Editor there are 92% believers in the USA, mostly Christions. Let us show Compassion for the unfortunate that need help. Andy
Report ViolationWhoever wrote this article ought to check his/her facts. The $542 max benefit is for cash assistance not food assistance for a family of 4. I have a family of 5 and am on disability. I am currently only receiving $375 (as of this 10/1 increase) for us to use. This results in 37.50/day/5 or approx 7.50 person per day. No one can eat healthy, esp kids b/t 9-17 on $7.50/day...this affect sleep, exercise, energy, learning, behavior, etc. I hate it when these rich folk get on the news or another study comes out linking obesity with "lazy food stamp recipients". We don't get enough food to be fat unless you count the processed cheap stuff I have to buy because I can't afford to buy the healthy vegetables, fruit, lean meat, cereals, etc.
Report ViolationYou want to blame our debt on immigrants that are here illegally tryig to make a better life for their families..you want them all to go back to where they came from...well then why don't you send every last one of us who are not Mexican or Native American because they were here first and we are the illegal immigrants that came over to make a better life for our families and created these problems for ourselves. In the 1900s, the African-Americans were to blame for our grief, in the 1800s, its was the Native Americans, in the 1700s the Europeans who settled here caused all our problems....quit blaming everyone else, face the facts that we created our own problems and we need to correct our own mistakes without blaming others. The U.S. is a mess because the U.S. is doing a lousy job of being their own accountant.
Increasing the food stamps for the low income, disabled, elderly, foster children and families stuggling to make ends meet is the moral thing to do, no matter where they are from. One day you may be forced to take some help and maybe you will realize just how difficult it is to swallow your pride and ask for the government's help to feed your family.
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.
Registered User?

RSS
E-mail
Print
Comments