RSSWashington state finds 30 dangerous illegal dams
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
So far all the owners of problematic dams are being cooperative and are moving diligently to fix the problems identified. We have issued orders of correction that will enable us to ramp up to penalties next if the owners fail to properly follow through on our requirements for correcting deficiencies. In some cases it is going to cost the owners tens of thousands of dollars to bring their dams up to standards. They will also be paying a hefty annual inspection fee.
JRW for Ecology
I would like to echo Derek's comment about penalties. Our watersheds are one of ou most valuable shared resources. Penalities should very clearly dissuade people from tampering with our watersheds.
However, I would also like to point out that this article completely ignored the environmental impacts of these illegal dams. There are major ecological consequences for dividing streams and cutting fish migration routes. Whereas beaver dams have coevolved with other aquatic species, these dams are too large for fish to migrate. I am furious that land owners would do this without the environmental review that such actions obligate. furthermore, the agency personnel in the article did not mention any ecological impacts.
Posting Guidelines - Updated Jan. 12, 2010
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines will lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Jan. 12, 2010.
One thing missing from this story is the words "They will be fined for breaking the law". Why is that? Do I even need to ask, or shall I just assume that once again nobody was held accountable for their actions?
Report ViolationWhoever did it should be fined. Whoever neglected to fine them should be fired. No wonder things are such a mess around here. I think I'll go break some laws and put the public in danger too, since apparently nobody really minds and all I'll get is a slap on the wrist.