Union Gap will hear pitch on aquatic center vote
Yakima Herald-Republic
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

RSS
The real question is: Should the City governments be in this business at all? Several attempts have been made to establish various aquatic centers nearby but have failed for mainly one reason - availability of financing - and if this were a good potential business idea, financing wouldn't have been a problem. To me, that answers the question that it wouldn't be a good business venture or at least, it would be a high risk one. Many years ago, the City of Spokane built several golf courses. However, the golf courses were such a good investment that the parks department, who were charged with their upkeep, never collected a cent of tax dollars to support all the beautiful Spokane parks because green fees paid for it all. Perhaps the city should get into the golf course business instead, which fits into our tourism goals and would help our struggling parks department and keep it from floundering.
Report Violation