Initiative 1000: Terminally ill should have a choice
Yakima Herald-Republic
Read2Learn: From reading the article still available for you to read at http://www.yakima-herald.com/stories/8404, and from witnessing self-induced deaths among institutionalized elderly friends who choose to stop eating, I think a doctor's time is an unnecessary expense. Social services among the survivors would be a better use of resources.
Report Violation
Posting Guidelines - Updated Aug. 21 2009
Readers are encouraged to use these forums to discuss issues affecting the
Yakima Valley. Debate the ideas presented in stories and other comments, but
refrain from personal attacks and offensive remarks aimed at others; e.g.,
you may call an idea idiotic, but don't say the person is an idiot. The
Herald-Republic reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason.
Examples include material that is obscene, encourages illegal activity or
stereotypes based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and
other factors. Continued violation of these guidelines can lead to
suspension or revocation of your ability to post comments. If you believe a
comment is inappropriate, you can bring it to our attention by clicking the
"report violation" link by each comment. Guidelines revised Aug. 21, 2009.

RSS
A very touchy subject...I wonder if the terminal patient would be required to take their life-ending prescription in the presence of the doctor? I'd be very wary of letting people pick up a death-pill from a pharmacy and then sending them home.
Report Violation